Skip to main content

Security report for datea.at

DATEA Services GmbH / ATEOS Services e.U. · Technology · Austria

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DATEA Services GmbH is a small Austrian technology company specializing in digital transformation consulting, software development, and managed IT services. Their website presents a professional image with clear service offerings under the themes discover, create, and operate. The company targets businesses seeking to leverage digital opportunities and make strategic decisions to advance their operations. The website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Slider Revolution, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility is basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is good with a privacy policy and cookie policy present, though no cookie consent mechanism is implemented due to the absence of cookies. WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy and consistency of the domain registration, matching the business claims and founding date. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, with room for improvement in security best practices and incident response transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching datea.at

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DATEA operates in the technology sector focusing on consulting and IT services for digital transformation. Their business model revolves around providing sustainable and trustworthy consulting, agile software development, and managed services. The company appears to be a niche player in the Austrian market with a clear branding strategy and consistent messaging. They leverage partnerships with technology providers and use modern marketing tools like Yoast SEO and Sendinblue. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests a controlled lead generation approach via contact forms. The company has been active since 2014, indicating stability and experience. No evidence of large-scale partnerships or subsidiaries was found, suggesting a focused operational scope.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses standard WordPress security plugins, but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS. No incident response or security policy pages are published, which could hinder transparency and readiness in case of security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of up-to-date plugins and themes reduces risk, but regular security audits are recommended. Privacy compliance is addressed with a privacy policy and cookie policy, though no active cookie consent mechanism is implemented, which is acceptable given the absence of cookies. Overall, the security posture is moderate with opportunities for enhancement in headers and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a cookie consent mechanism or explicit statement on cookie usage to align with GDPR best practices.
  4. Regularly update and audit WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding direct contact information such as company email and phone number to improve trust and accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DATEA Services GmbH / ATEOS Services e.U.
Description
Empowering your digital world. Entdecke mit uns das digitale Universum: Unser erfahrenes Team steht dir zur Seite, um die Chancen und Möglichkeiten der digitalen Welt optimal zu nutzen und strategische Entscheidungen zu treffen, die dein Unternehmen voranbringen. Nachhaltige und vertrauensvolle Unternehmensberatung.
Key services
Unternehmensberatung (discover), Softwareentwicklung (create), Managed Services (operate)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Yoast SEO Premium, jQuery 3.7.1, Slider Revolution 6.7.29, FontAwesome, Avada Theme, Mailin (Sendinblue) plugin, Statify analytics plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Statify
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Sendinblue (Mailin plugin)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is business-focused, targeting digital transformation and IT consulting.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML; contact is via form.
  4. No cookie consent banner despite cookie policy stating no cookies used.
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools indicates good digital maturity.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 using the Avada theme and several plugins including Yoast SEO Premium, Slider Revolution, Mailin (Sendinblue), and Statify analytics. The tech stack is modern and well-supported, enabling good SEO and marketing capabilities. Performance is moderate with some optimization possible. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details were not explicitly found. The site uses standard web fonts and icon libraries such as FontAwesome. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with datea.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review datea.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.