Skip to main content

Security report for datagroup.de

DATAGROUP · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Network security.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DATAGROUP is a leading German IT service provider offering a comprehensive portfolio of managed IT services, cloud, SAP, security, and digitalization solutions. The company targets businesses in Germany seeking reliable and professional IT support. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with multilingual support, professional video content, and structured navigation. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and WPML, and employs Usercentrics for cookie consent management, indicating GDPR awareness. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, though improvements in privacy policy transparency and incident response information are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching datagroup.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
70
Email security
65
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention datagroup.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
254
Employees
6
Customers
94
Third parties
154
Weak passwords
4%

Latest record dated 2026-06-04 · 15 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for datagroup.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –training.datagroup.de2026-06-04
  • –webmail.datagroup.de2026-05-13
  • –training.datagroup.de2026-03-04
  • –training.datagroup.de2025-05-16
  • –training.datagroup.de2025-04-29

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DATAGROUP positions itself as a major player in the German IT services market, focusing on managed services under the CORBOX brand, digital transformation, and AI solutions. The business model revolves around providing end-to-end IT operations support, consulting, and compliance services. The company leverages a broad service portfolio to serve medium to large enterprises across various industries. The website's investor relations section and multi-location presence indicate a large organizational size and market reach. The use of professional marketing tools and tracking services suggests a strategic approach to customer engagement and lead generation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a reputable cookie consent management platform, reflecting compliance with GDPR cookie regulations. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate room for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which could enhance transparency and trust. The minimal WHOIS data and lack of detailed registrant information slightly reduce domain trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by publishing comprehensive security policies and improving technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages prominently linked on the website.
  2. Implement and publish a security policy including incident response contact information.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection.
  4. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DATAGROUP
Description
Einer der führenden deutschen IT Dienstleister macht IT für Sie einfacher. Das Portfolio umfasst alle Services für einen sorgenfreien IT-Betrieb.
Key services
CORBOX managed IT services, Cloud Services, SAP Services, Application and Data Management, Network Services, Security Services, Communication and Collaboration, Workplace Services, Compliance Services, Service Desk
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, WPML (multilingual plugin), jQuery, Video.js, Usercentrics CMP, HubSpot WordPress plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management via Usercentrics

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Usercentrics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and targeted at German IT service customers.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the scanned content.
  4. Cookie consent is managed via Usercentrics CMP, indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. Multiple videos used in hero slider for marketing and branding.
  6. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the scanned HTML content.
  7. Social media presence includes Facebook and LinkedIn.
  8. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  10. No explicit security or incident response contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Video.js for media playback, and multilingual support via WPML. SEO is enhanced using Yoast SEO plugin. Cookie consent is managed by Usercentrics CMP, indicating GDPR compliance efforts. The site uses HubSpot for analytics and marketing automation. Performance is moderate with multiple embedded videos which may impact load times. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. No major technical issues or broken elements were detected in the HTML content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with datagroup.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review datagroup.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.