Skip to main content

Security report for databox.hr

DataBox · Technology · Croatia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DataBox is a Croatian technology company specializing in secure data center colocation, cloud computing services, and telecommunication solutions. Established in 2014, the company positions itself as a key provider of secure business infrastructure in Croatia, offering Tier 3 and Tier 4 standard data center facilities, cloud backup, disaster recovery, and advanced IP telephony services. Their market position is supported by over 10 years of experience and a focus on reliability and security for business customers. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, with a professional design and clear navigation. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website reflects a credible and professional business with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching databox.hr

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DataBox operates primarily in the technology and telecommunications sectors, targeting business customers in Croatia who require secure and reliable data infrastructure. Their business model is B2B, providing colocation, dedicated server rooms, cloud services, and telecommunication access including internet and IP telephony. The company emphasizes high availability, data security, and modern infrastructure, which are competitive advantages in the Croatian market. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a controlled communication channel via contact forms. The company leverages partnerships with technology providers and uses Google marketing tools. Growth indicators include a decade of operation and a comprehensive service portfolio. Strategic observations include the need to enhance privacy and security disclosures to align with GDPR and industry best practices.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with mandatory HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no public security policy or incident response information, nor a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which limits transparency and trust for security-conscious clients. The use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics is standard but requires proper configuration to ensure privacy compliance. No vulnerable libraries or exposed credentials were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a business website but could be enhanced by adopting explicit security policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve web security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to increase transparency and trust.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and provide a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide direct contact information such as company emails and phone numbers for better user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DataBox
Description
DataBox svojim Cloud, Data Centar i Telekom rješenjima korisnicima nudi visoku razinu sigurnosti podataka te olakšava pristup do istih.
Key services
Data Center Colocation, Dedicated Server Rooms, Cloud Services (Virtual Data Center, Backup, Storage, Disaster Recovery), Telecommunication Services (Internet Access, IP Telephony, Dark Fiber)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Font Awesome 6.5.0, Yoast SEO plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics with Site Kit

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is in Croatian language targeting Croatian businesses
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found
  4. Contact information is only via contact form, no direct emails or phone numbers found in HTML
  5. Strong focus on data center, cloud, and telecommunication services
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. No social media links explicitly found in HTML
  10. Good branding consistency and professional design
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end using jQuery 3.7.1 and Font Awesome icons. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics via the Site Kit plugin, indicating a mature digital marketing setup. The site uses responsive design and SEO best practices including meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting details are not explicit but the domain is registered with CARNET, a Croatian academic network registrar, consistent with the local business focus. Performance is moderate with video backgrounds and animations that may impact load times. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities include improving accessibility and adding security headers to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with databox.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review databox.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.