Skip to main content

Security report for data-projekt.fr

Data Projekt · Technology · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Data Projekt is a French digital agency based in Strasbourg, founded in 2006, specializing in UX expertise, custom website creation, and digital transformation services. The company targets businesses and organizations seeking tailored digital solutions, emphasizing user experience and innovative web platforms. Their market position is that of a well-established regional agency with a strong portfolio of clients and projects, supported by a consistent brand presence and professional content. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Gravity Forms, and various UI libraries. The site demonstrates excellent mobile optimization, fast performance, and good SEO practices. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement, security headers, anti-spam protections, and cookie consent management, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of an explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages indicates room for improvement in compliance and transparency. WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly reduces trust but is common for this business type. Overall, Data Projekt presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence with solid technical and security foundations. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and legal policies, implementing a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure, and enhancing incident response transparency to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching data-projekt.fr

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Data Projekt operates as a specialized digital agency focusing on UX and custom digital solutions, serving a diverse client base including cultural institutions, energy companies, and regional organizations. Their competitive advantage lies in their UX expertise and ability to deliver bespoke web platforms using modern technologies like React and Symfony. The business model is service-oriented, generating revenue through consulting, design, development, and digital transformation projects. Growth indicators include a broad portfolio of high-profile clients and active social media engagement. The agency maintains a consistent branding strategy and leverages partnerships with technology providers and content delivery networks to optimize service delivery.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented. Anti-spam measures via CleanTalk and consent management through Axeptio indicate attention to user privacy and data protection. No exposed credentials or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the lack of a published privacy policy and incident response contacts suggests gaps in compliance with GDPR and best practices for transparency. The absence of a security.txt file limits vulnerability disclosure options. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from formalizing policies and communication channels related to security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
  2. Add terms of service to clarify legal conditions and user agreements.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Data Projekt
Description
Data Projekt est une agence digitale, créée à Strasbourg en 2006. Elle est experte en UX et spécialisée en création de sites, plateformes web, transformation digitale, ...
Key services
Conseil digital, Création de sites web sur-mesure, Développement de plateformes web sur-mesure, UX-UI Design, Motion design, Application mobile, Advergames
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Gravity Forms, LightSlider, LightGallery, Freezeframe, Splide, WP Rocket, WordPress
Frameworks
Symfony, React (mentioned in content)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Anti-spam plugin (CleanTalk)
  • Consent management via Axeptio

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CleanTalk pixel
Marketing tools
Axeptio consent management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms
  3. Strong focus on UX and digital transformation services
  4. Multiple client references and project case studies
  5. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress)
  6. Consent management implemented for cookies
  7. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found
  8. Contact phone number and form clearly available
  9. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Vimeo
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, enhanced with modern JavaScript libraries and UI frameworks such as LightSlider, LightGallery, and Splide for interactive content presentation. The use of Gravity Forms indicates structured data collection capabilities. Performance optimizations include WP Rocket caching and CDN usage via kxcdn.com. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks are minimal, though reliance on multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security audits to prevent vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with data-projekt.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review data-projekt.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.