Skip to main content

Security report for darwin.cx

Darwin CX · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Darwin CX is a technology company offering a comprehensive SaaS platform focused on real-time customer insights, campaign management, fulfillment, financial reporting, and customer support tailored for recurring revenue businesses. The website positions Darwin CX as a key player in providing integrated solutions to businesses seeking to optimize customer experience and revenue management. The platform targets businesses with subscription or recurring revenue models, emphasizing operational efficiency and customer engagement. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Webflow for site building, HubSpot for marketing and form management, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site is mobile optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices, although some accessibility features could be enhanced. Performance is moderate, with a professional design and clear navigation. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure form submissions via HubSpot. Cookie consent is managed through OneTrust, indicating awareness of privacy compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers and lack of published privacy and terms of service pages represent gaps in security posture. No WHOIS data is publicly available for the domain, which reduces transparency and trustworthiness, although the professional site and use of reputable third-party services mitigate some concerns. Overall, Darwin CX presents a solid digital presence with a good security baseline but would benefit from enhanced transparency through published policies and improved security headers. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable concern that should be addressed to improve trust and legitimacy perception.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 29 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching darwin.cx

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Darwin CX operates in the technology sector, providing SaaS solutions for recurring revenue businesses. Its market positioning focuses on delivering an all-in-one platform for customer insights and operational management. The business model is subscription-based SaaS, targeting mid-sized companies with recurring revenue streams. The company leverages partnerships with marketing and analytics platforms like HubSpot and Google Analytics to enhance its offerings. Growth indicators include active marketing campaigns and upcoming events such as the Evolve 2025 German User Conference. The absence of direct contact details and limited public business registration information suggests a focus on digital lead generation via forms. Strategic observations include the need to improve transparency and compliance documentation to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The security posture of Darwin CX is moderate to good. The website enforces HTTPS, uses secure third-party form handling (HubSpot), and implements a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which limits the ability to respond to security incidents effectively. The missing WHOIS data and absence of privacy and terms of service pages represent compliance and transparency gaps. Overall, the site demonstrates awareness of security best practices but requires improvements in policy publication and technical security controls to enhance its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against attacks.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Darwin CX
Description
Your single source of real-time customer insights, campaign management, fulfillment, financial reporting, customer support, for your recurring revenue business
Key services
Real-time customer insights, Campaign management, Fulfillment services, Financial reporting, Customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust, Finsweet CMS Slider, Splide.js, Localize.js
Frameworks
HubSpot CMS integrations
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Secure form submission via HubSpot

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Ads Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot marketing tools, OneTrust cookie consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and functional
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces transparency
  3. Privacy policy page not found or not linked
  4. Cookie consent implemented via OneTrust
  5. Contact only via forms, no direct emails or phone numbers publicly listed
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response information found
  7. Use of modern web technologies and marketing tools
  8. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected in content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow, integrating HubSpot for marketing automation and form management, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and OneTrust for cookie consent. It uses modern JavaScript libraries such as Finsweet CMS Slider and Splide.js for UI components. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for SEO with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting is provided by Webflow, ensuring reliable uptime and SSL support. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and accessibility compliance. The technical stack reflects a mature digital infrastructure suitable for a SaaS business, though improvements in security headers and policy documentation are recommended to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with darwin.cx. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review darwin.cx.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.