Skip to main content

Security report for dandomain.dk

Dandomain · Technology · Denmark

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dandomain is a leading Danish domain registrar and hosting provider established in 1999, serving over 70,000 customers including private individuals and businesses. The company offers domain registration, web hosting, a popular webshop platform, and email/office solutions tailored to the Danish market. Their market position is strong, supported by a professional website, active social media presence, and customer trust signals such as Trustpilot integration. Technically, the website is built on a modern Angular framework with integration of standard marketing and tracking tools like Google Tag Manager and Bing Ads. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy and long-standing nature of the domain, aligning well with the business claims. Overall, Dandomain presents a credible and professional online presence with room for improvement in transparency around security policies and incident handling.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dandomain.dk

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dandomain operates in the technology and e-commerce sectors, focusing on domain registration and hosting services primarily for the Danish market. Their business model includes providing web hosting, webshop platforms, and email services, targeting both private and business customers. The company leverages a strong brand with consistent messaging and a well-structured website. Partnerships with remote support providers and dedicated support portals enhance their service ecosystem. The presence of multiple subdomains for customer center and webmail services indicates a mature operational infrastructure. Growth indicators include a large customer base and active marketing via social media and review platforms. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance trust further by publishing detailed security and incident response information.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and a robust cookie consent framework compliant with GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security transparency and readiness. The use of modern frameworks and absence of known vulnerable libraries are positive indicators. To improve security posture, Dandomain should consider publishing a security policy, incident response procedures, and a vulnerability disclosure program. Adding security headers would further harden the site against common web attacks. Overall, the security culture appears adequate but could benefit from enhanced communication and formalization.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Add HTTP security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Maintain and regularly audit third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dandomain
Description
Danmarks førende domæne registrator og mest stabile hosting med over 70.000 kunder. Både private og erhverv. Danmarks mest populære webshop platform
Key services
Domain registration, Web hosting, Webshop platform, Email and office solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular (ng-version=19.2.5), Font Awesome 6, Iubenda cookie consent, Google Tag Manager, Trustpilot widget
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Bing Ads tracking
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Bing Ads, Iubenda cookie consent
Marketing tools
Iubenda cookie consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional, established Danish domain registrar and hosting provider
  2. Uses modern Angular framework and integrates standard marketing and tracking tools
  3. Has comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with granular controls
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  5. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-standing operation
  6. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Angular 19.2.5, indicating a modern single-page application architecture. It uses Font Awesome 6 for icons and integrates third-party services such as Iubenda for cookie consent management, Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, and Trustpilot for customer reviews. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good SEO meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN resources. Hosting provider details are not explicitly stated. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require monitoring for security and performance impacts. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented with opportunities for further optimization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dandomain.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dandomain.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.