Skip to main content

Security report for dancebeat.lv

Dancebeat · Education · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, DNS health and 3 other checks.

Security score

36/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dancebeat.lv is a Latvian dance studio website offering dance classes for children, youth, and adults across multiple branches in Latvia. The site provides detailed information about dance styles, trainers, events, and enrollment forms. The business appears to be well-established since 2015, targeting a broad audience interested in various dance disciplines such as Hip Hop, House, Jazz, and Zumba. The website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrates Google Analytics and YouTube APIs for enhanced user engagement and tracking. From a technical perspective, the site uses a solid technology stack including WordPress CMS, jQuery, Revolution Slider, and Gravity Forms for data collection. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper metadata and structured data. However, some security best practices like security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which could be improved to enhance compliance and security posture. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure form plugins, but lacks explicit security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust verification. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could benefit from enhanced privacy and security features. The overall risk assessment is moderate with recommendations to implement security headers, cookie consent, and maintain updated plugins. The business credibility and content quality are strong, supporting a positive user experience and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      DNS Resolution Failed

      Unable to resolve domain A records

      What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dancebeat.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
25
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
36

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dancebeat.lv operates as a regional dance education provider with multiple branches in Latvia, serving children, youth, and adults. Its competitive advantage lies in offering diverse dance styles and qualified trainers with formal education in dance pedagogy and physiotherapy. The business model focuses on class enrollment and event participation, supported by an online application form. The presence of sponsors and partner links indicates a supportive ecosystem. Growth indicators include active event promotion and seasonal enrollment campaigns. The company targets local communities and dance enthusiasts, positioning itself as a key player in Latvian dance education.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of reputable plugins like Gravity Forms for secure data collection. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a cookie consent mechanism indicate gaps in compliance and defense-in-depth strategies. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which may affect transparency. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML and shows no signs of vulnerabilities. Regular updates and security hardening are recommended to maintain and improve security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to prevent vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and preparedness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic SEO audits to maintain technical excellence.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dancebeat
Description
Deju nodarbības bērniem, jauniešiem, pieaugušajiem Hip Hop, house, jazz, klasika, veselības vingrošana, Afro dance, ritmika, Zumba, Freestyle
Key services
Dance classes, Dance events, Dance training for various age groups
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, YouTube API, Gravity Forms, Revolution Slider, Slick Carousel
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure form plugin (Gravity Forms)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based dance studio site with multiple branches in Latvia.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian with some English metadata.
  3. Includes detailed trainer profiles and event news.
  4. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. No signs of malicious or adult content.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  7. Privacy policy and terms of service are present and accessible.
  8. No cookie consent mechanism detected.
  9. Contact form collects personal data including name, birthdate, contact info, and consent.
  10. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with a combination of popular plugins such as Revolution Slider, Gravity Forms, and YouTube Channel integration. It uses jQuery and modern JavaScript libraries for interactive elements like sliders and forms. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are implemented for tracking user behavior. The site is responsive with mobile optimization and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Performance is moderate with some heavy slider assets but overall user experience is smooth. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dancebeat.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dancebeat.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.