Skip to main content

Security report for dan.lv

DAN Communications · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DAN Communications is a Latvia-based medium-sized technology and telecommunications company specializing in radio communications and cybersecurity solutions. The company offers a range of products including Fortinet FortiGate security solutions, Motorola radio communication devices, and backup solutions such as NAKIVO. Their services include industry-specific solutions, training, and distribution, targeting businesses and organizations primarily in the Baltic region. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear navigation and relevant content for their target audience. Technically, the website employs legacy technologies such as jQuery 1.11.0 alongside modern analytics tools like Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices but lacks advanced accessibility features. There is no detected CMS or hosting provider information. SEO is basic with meta keywords and viewport settings but no structured data or Open Graph tags. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes no visible exposed sensitive data. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version introduces potential vulnerabilities. No security headers or explicit security policies are present, and no privacy or cookie policies are disclosed, indicating gaps in compliance and security transparency. Contact information is not explicitly provided in the HTML, limiting direct communication channels. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires improvements in security practices, privacy compliance, and transparency to enhance trust and reduce risk. Strategic recommendations include updating third-party libraries, implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear contact channels for security incidents.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dan.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DAN Communications holds a solid position in the Baltic technology and telecommunications market, leveraging partnerships with major vendors like Fortinet and Motorola. Their business model focuses on B2B sales, distribution, and specialized services in radio communications and cybersecurity. The company has a long operational history since 1996, indicating stability and experience. Their product portfolio and service offerings cater to organizations requiring secure communication and IT infrastructure solutions. The website content and partner references suggest a well-established ecosystem with regional recognition and awards, supporting growth and market credibility.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is moderate but with notable gaps. HTTPS is implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the use of an outdated jQuery library exposes the site to known vulnerabilities. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are published, which is a compliance risk under GDPR. Incident response contact channels are not provided, limiting the ability to report security issues. Overall, the site lacks comprehensive security best practices and transparency, which could impact business reputation and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Update all third-party libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement and publicly disclose comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, Strict-Transport-Security) to enhance protection against web attacks.
  4. Provide clear and accessible contact information, including dedicated security incident response channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Conduct a full security audit and penetration test to identify and remediate any hidden vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DAN Communications
Description
DAN Communications is a company specializing in radio communications and cybersecurity solutions, offering products such as Fortinet FortiGate, Motorola radio communications, and backup solutions like NAKIVO. They provide industry-specific solutions, training services, and distribution.
Key services
Radio communication expertise, Cybersecurity products and solutions, Training and services, Distribution of technology products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.0, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (assumed from external scripts loaded via https)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information such as emails or phone numbers is not explicitly presented in the HTML content.
  4. Social media presence includes Facebook and LinkedIn official company pages.
  5. Use of outdated jQuery version is a security concern.
  6. No visible security headers or explicit security policies disclosed.
  7. Website content is professional and consistent with a medium-sized technology/telecommunications business.
  8. Analytics usage is moderate with Google Analytics and Tag Manager implemented without visible consent mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional HTML structure with external JavaScript libraries including an outdated jQuery 1.11.0, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager for tracking. No modern frameworks or CMS platforms are detected. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and performance but lacks advanced accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta keywords and viewport settings but no structured data or Open Graph tags. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not explicitly available. The technical stack is functional but shows signs of technical debt and modernization opportunities, especially regarding security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dan.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dan.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.