Skip to main content

Security report for damcraft.de

Private by Design, LLC · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lina.sh is a personal website of Lina, an 18-year-old developer from Germany, known for her work exposing wrongful ISP domain blocking in Germany. The site serves as a portfolio, blog, and community hub with donation support and secure communication via PGP. The business model is primarily personal branding and community engagement, targeting developers and privacy-conscious users. The domain is registered under Private by Design, LLC in the US, consistent with the website's privacy-focused ethos. Technically, the site is built with clean HTML and CSS without JavaScript, emphasizing privacy and performance. It uses Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with fast performance and basic SEO. No CMS or analytics tools are detected, reflecting a minimalist and privacy-first approach. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections, but lacks advanced security headers and incident response information. No privacy or cookie policies are published, representing compliance gaps. No tracking or advertising scripts are present, enhancing user privacy. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional for a personal developer portfolio, but could improve compliance and security transparency. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC, publishing security.txt, and enhancing security headers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching damcraft.de

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
40
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention damcraft.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for damcraft.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lina.sh operates as a niche personal developer website with a strong focus on privacy and transparency. The site leverages Lina's reputation in the ISP transparency community to engage a tech-savvy audience. Revenue streams are primarily donation-based via PayPal and Ko-fi. The partnership ecosystem includes payment processors and community platforms like Discord. The business model is straightforward, focusing on content and community rather than commercial services. Growth indicators include active social media presence and ongoing blog updates. The site maintains a consistent brand and content quality, positioning it well within its niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited statuses, reducing risk of hijacking. The publication of a PGP public key supports secure communication. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts indicates gaps in security governance and compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The site does not use JavaScript, reducing attack surface. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a personal site but could be enhanced to meet higher compliance standards such as GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to enhance GDPR compliance.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident response.
  5. Add explicit incident response contact information to improve security transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Private by Design, LLC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Private by Design, LLC
Description
Personal website of Lina, an 18-year-old developer from Germany, known for projects like CUII-Liste which exposes wrongful blocking of domains by German ISPs. The site includes personal blog, social links, donation options, and PGP key.
Key services
Blog content, Social media and community engagement, Donation support, PGP key distribution
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, No JavaScript (explicitly stated), Cloudflare DNS
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by domain and Cloudflare usage)
  • Domain status flags clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited
  • PGP public key published for secure communication

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal developer portfolio and blog with strong focus on privacy and transparency.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. No JavaScript used, unusual but intentional for privacy and performance.
  4. Donation options are clearly presented with reputable platforms.
  5. PGP key is published for secure communication.
  6. No security.txt or incident response info found.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating strong privacy focus.
  8. Site uses Cloudflare DNS but no DNSSEC enabled.
  9. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is relatively new but appropriate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with a minimalist tech stack using only HTML and CSS, explicitly avoiding JavaScript to enhance privacy and performance. It is hosted with Cloudflare DNS and registered via Porkbun LLC. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with fast loading times. No CMS or third-party analytics tools are used, reducing technical complexity and privacy risks. The absence of JavaScript and tracking scripts indicates a deliberate design choice prioritizing user privacy. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers suggests opportunities for technical modernization to improve security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with damcraft.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review damcraft.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.