Skip to main content

Security report for dach-checker.de

CREATON GmbH · Technology · Germany

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website https://dach-checker.de/login serves as a login portal for CREATON GmbH's visualization service. It targets business users or clients who require access to specialized visualization tools or services. The site is branded consistently with CREATON GmbH and provides a basic but functional interface for user authentication. However, the site lacks comprehensive business information, privacy policies, and contact details, which limits transparency and user trust. Technically, the site uses standard HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript with a CSRF token implemented in the login form, indicating some security awareness. The absence of security headers and explicit HTTPS confirmation in the HTML content suggests room for improvement in security posture. The site does not employ external analytics, advertising, or tracking technologies, which reduces privacy concerns but also limits marketing insights. From a security perspective, the site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, but it lacks visible security best practices such as HTTP security headers and privacy compliance indicators. The WHOIS data is minimal but does not raise immediate red flags. Overall, the site scores moderately on content quality, technical implementation, and security posture but scores low on privacy compliance and business credibility due to missing policies and contact information. Strategic recommendations include implementing and publishing privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers and HTTPS enforcement, providing clear contact and business information, and adding vulnerability disclosure and incident response details to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dach-checker.de

This scan found 31 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
55
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
15
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CREATON GmbH appears to operate in the technology sector, providing visualization services likely targeted at business clients. The business model is service-oriented with user authentication required to access the platform. The company maintains consistent branding but provides minimal public-facing business information on this portal. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries linked to this domain. The lack of marketing and analytics tools suggests a focus on controlled client access rather than broad consumer engagement. Growth indicators and revenue streams cannot be determined from the available data.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. The presence of a CSRF token in the login form is a positive security control. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulations. The site uses HTTPS as implied by the login form action URL but does not explicitly confirm SSL configuration quality.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information and business details on the website to increase transparency and trust.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels.
  5. Ensure full HTTPS enforcement and verify SSL/TLS configuration for strong encryption.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CREATON GmbH
Description
The website provides a visualization service branded under CREATON GmbH, likely related to digital or graphical services given the login portal and branding.
Key services
Visualisierungsservice (visualization service)
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS (app.css), JavaScript (app.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token implemented in login form

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for CREATON GmbH visualization service.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the page.
  3. No contact information such as emails or phone numbers visible.
  4. CSRF token implemented in login form indicating some security awareness.
  5. No external analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  6. Minimal metadata and no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data present.
  7. No security headers or explicit HTTPS confirmation visible in HTML content.
  8. WHOIS data is minimal but domain appears legitimate with standard DNS.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack consisting of HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. The login form includes a CSRF token, indicating some security consideration. Performance appears moderate with minimal external resources. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. SEO metadata is minimal with no Open Graph or structured data present. Hosting provider and domain age details are not available from the provided data. There is an opportunity to modernize the technical stack by adding SEO enhancements, accessibility improvements, and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dach-checker.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dach-checker.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.