Skip to main content

Security report for cyberwa.com

CyberWA, Inc. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CyberWA, Inc. is a boutique cybersecurity firm specializing in elite concierge cyber protective services tailored for high-value individuals and organizations. Established in 2014, the company positions itself as a personal guardian offering customized cyber protection solutions, leveraging decades of international cybersecurity experience. Their key services include personal cyber protection, organizational cyber protection, and a proprietary Cyber Audit Platform (CAP). The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting discerning clients who require high confidentiality and integrity in cybersecurity services. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and WooCommerce, hosted by IONOS SE, and integrates Google Analytics and MonsterInsights for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections, but DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are absent. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but lacking cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR indicators. Contact information is limited to a postal address and a contact form, with no direct emails or phone numbers listed. Overall, the domain registration details align with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. The site is safe with no adult or explicit content detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cyberwa.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cyberwa.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for cyberwa.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CyberWA operates in the technology sector, focusing on cybersecurity services for a niche market of high-net-worth and highly visible clients. Their concierge model emphasizes personalized service and confidentiality, differentiating them from mass-market cybersecurity providers. The company leverages its international experience to offer tailored solutions, including a proprietary audit platform. The business model likely relies on premium service contracts and consulting. The website's LinkedIn presence supports professional networking and credibility. No direct phone or email contacts are publicly listed, possibly to maintain client privacy. The company appears small but specialized, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The lack of extensive certifications or security policy disclosures may indicate an opportunity for growth in trust signals. Marketing efforts include Google Ads and tracking tools, but no affiliate programs are evident.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and has domain transfer protections in place, indicating a baseline security posture. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which may impact client trust and compliance with regulations like GDPR or NIS2. The site uses modern WordPress plugins but does not show evidence of vulnerability scanning or mitigation. Forms are present but no direct email addresses are exposed, reducing phishing risk. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with enhanced domain security, security headers, and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive security and incident response policies to enhance client trust and compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve privacy compliance scores.
  5. Consider publishing direct contact channels for security incidents (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails) to improve incident response readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
CyberWA, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CyberWA, Inc.
Description
An exclusive boutique cybersecurity firm singularly focused on protecting discerning high-value individuals and organizations with elite concierge cyber protective services.
Key services
Personal Cyber Protection, Organizational Cyber Protection, Cyber Audit Platform (CAP)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, WooCommerce, Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, jQuery, PHP
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
MonsterInsights, Jetpack Stats
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. No explicit privacy cookie consent mechanism detected.
  3. No explicit security or incident response policy pages found.
  4. Uses modern WordPress plugins and frameworks.
  5. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  6. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn.
  7. No phone numbers or emails explicitly listed on homepage or footer.
  8. Contact form present but no direct emails or phone numbers found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It uses common JavaScript libraries including jQuery and integrates Google Analytics via MonsterInsights for tracking. Hosting is provided by IONOS SE, a reputable registrar and hosting provider. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO metadata, including canonical links and RSS feeds. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. The site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are technical risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from security hardening and enhanced privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cyberwa.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cyberwa.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.