Skip to main content

Security report for cybertec.at

CYBERTEC PostgreSQL · Technology · Austria

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CYBERTEC PostgreSQL is a specialized technology company providing professional PostgreSQL services, support, training, and software products. The company targets enterprises and organizations seeking scalable and reliable PostgreSQL solutions, including migration, clustering, tuning, and consulting. Their market position is that of an established PostgreSQL expert with a comprehensive portfolio of services and products. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site runs on WordPress with modern plugins and performance optimizations, ensuring fast loading and good accessibility. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent mechanisms, although some security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain transparency and trustworthiness, but the website content and branding indicate a legitimate business. Overall, the risk is moderate with recommendations to enhance domain registration transparency and security headers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cybertec.at

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CYBERTEC operates in the technology sector focusing on PostgreSQL database solutions. Their business model combines software product offerings with professional services such as support, migration, and training. The company appears medium-sized, founded around 2016, with a clear target audience of enterprises requiring PostgreSQL expertise. Their competitive advantage lies in deep specialization and a broad product suite including Kubernetes support and cloud-native solutions. The company maintains active social media channels and compliance information, supporting growth and trust. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed on the site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. Security best practices include no visible exposure of sensitive data and use of security-related plugins. However, some common security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not explicitly detected and should be implemented to harden the site further. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which could be improved to enhance security transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve incident response transparency.
  3. Clarify domain registration details or use a WHOIS privacy service with transparency to improve trust.
  4. Add a clear Terms of Service page to cover legal and compliance aspects.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CYBERTEC PostgreSQL
Description
CYBERTEC is your professional partner for PostgreSQL services, support and training.
Key services
PostgreSQL support, Migration to PostgreSQL, Clustering & HA, PostgreSQL tuning, Spatial services, Consulting, Training
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, Yoast SEO Premium, jQuery 3.7.1, Alpine.js 3.10.5, WP Rocket caching, Borlabs Cookie plugin, Urvanov Syntax Highlighter, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Tag Manager, Lightfunnels tracker
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Borlabs Cookie)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Lightfunnels tracker
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Professional and comprehensive website focused on PostgreSQL services and products.
  3. Strong SEO and structured data implementation.
  4. Good privacy and cookie compliance with consent mechanisms.
  5. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which reduces domain trustworthiness.
  7. No explicit terms of service page found.
  8. Contact information is available via contact page and forms.
  9. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO Premium, Alpine.js, and WP Rocket for caching and performance. It uses Google Fonts and integrates Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with structured data (JSON-LD) implemented for SEO. Performance is fast due to caching and minification. No hosting provider details were found in the HTML. The technical implementation is robust with room for security header improvements and enhanced incident response capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cybertec.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cybertec.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.