Skip to main content

Security report for cybersitter.com

27LABS, LLC · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

27LABS, LLC is a small technology company specializing in Windows security and content management software, with a history dating back to 1990. Their product portfolio includes CYBERsitter for Windows, CYBERsitter BLACK for networks, and a weather station app called Teapot for Tempest Weather Stations. The company targets home users, schools, libraries, and network administrators, offering software solutions with free updates and no recurring fees. The website presents a professional image with consistent branding and clear product descriptions, although direct contact details are limited to an embedded contact form.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cybersitter.com

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
100
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates a niche business model focused on specialized security and content management software for Windows environments, complemented by a weather app product. Their market positioning is that of a trusted, long-established provider with a loyal customer base. The use of subdomains and partner domains for product-specific sites indicates a segmented approach to marketing. The absence of direct contact emails and phone numbers may limit customer engagement. The company leverages Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user insights but lacks explicit cookie consent mechanisms, which may impact privacy compliance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with good SSL configuration and uses secure iframes for contact forms, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the absence of security headers and published security policies or incident response information suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of cookie consent and privacy compliance features is a notable gap. The missing WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, which could affect trust and security perceptions.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website.
  4. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers to improve customer support and credibility.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
27LABS, LLC
Description
27LABS publishes award winning Windows security and content management and security software for Windows PC's and servers.
Key services
Windows security software, Content management software, Network protection software, Weather station applications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, jQuery 2.2.4, Bootstrap, Tether.js, RapidWeaver Foundry theme, Stacks plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Windows (targeted by products), iOS and Mac (for weather app)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure iframe for contact form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about software products.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  4. Privacy and terms of service pages are present and linked.
  5. Contact is available only via embedded contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking.
  7. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  9. Website uses RapidWeaver CMS with Foundry theme and multiple stacks plugins.
  10. Products focus on Windows security and weather station applications.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the RapidWeaver CMS with the Foundry theme and multiple stacks plugins, including jQuery 2.2.4, Bootstrap, and Tether.js. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic but includes proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cybersitter.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cybersitter.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.