Skip to main content

Security report for cyberland.io

Atom · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Atom operates a professional domain marketplace platform offering premium domain names such as CyberLand.io. The website is well designed, mobile optimized, and provides multiple contact channels including phone, email, and chat support. The platform targets startups and technology companies seeking brandable domain names. Technically, the site uses modern monitoring tools like New Relic and Google Tag Manager, and enforces HTTPS for secure communications. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as missing WHOIS data for the domain, present gaps in compliance and trust verification. Security posture is generally good with no visible vulnerabilities, but could be improved with additional security headers and explicit policies. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cyberland.io

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
98
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Atom positions itself as a curated domain marketplace with a focus on premium and brandable domains. Its business model revolves around domain sales and brokerage, supplemented by branding services such as free logos. The target audience includes startups and tech companies looking for innovative domain names. The platform leverages partnerships with payment and support services but does not publicly disclose detailed business registration or certifications. Market positioning is solid within the domain sales niche, with a medium-sized operational scale. The presence of Trustpilot references and multiple contact methods supports customer trust, though explicit certifications are absent.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of security monitoring tools like New Relic. However, the lack of visible security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and absence of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file indicate areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. The site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. Incident response contact channels are not provided. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a domain marketplace but should be enhanced to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Improve accessibility features to meet modern standards and enhance user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Atom
Description
CyberLand.io is available for sale on Atom. Buy this premium domain name and get a free logo. CyberLand.io has strong buyer interest, so act now! The domain evokes innovation, technology, and connectivity, ideal for startups.
Key services
Domain sales, Domain brokerage, Branding and logo services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
New Relic Browser monitoring, Bootstrap CSS, Google Fonts, Intercom chat widget
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible sensitive data exposure
  • Use of security monitoring scripts (New Relic)

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Tag Manager
Tracking pixels
New Relic
Marketing tools
Intercom
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a domain marketplace listing page for CyberLand.io domain.
  2. No WHOIS data available from raw output; domain registration status unclear.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the page.
  4. Contact information includes phone, email, and chat support links.
  5. Site uses HTTPS and modern monitoring tools (New Relic).
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. No explicit security policies or certifications displayed.
  8. Site content is professional and targeted at domain buyers.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Google Fonts for typography, and New Relic for performance and error monitoring. It integrates Intercom for live chat support and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tags. The site is hosted securely with HTTPS and loads external resources from reputable CDNs. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. However, no CMS or hosting provider details were detected. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in accessibility and security headers are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cyberland.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cyberland.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.