Skip to main content

Security report for cyberchimps.com

CyberChimps · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CyberChimps is a technology company specializing in the development and distribution of responsive, customizable WordPress themes. Their website showcases their flagship responsive theme and integrates modern web technologies such as Elementor and Yoast SEO to enhance user experience and search engine visibility. The company targets WordPress users and developers seeking flexible and fast website themes, positioning itself as a known provider in the WordPress theme market. The business model likely includes free themes with premium upgrades or support services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and includes third-party integrations like Google Tag Manager and Trustpilot for analytics and reviews. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and trust. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers and policy transparency. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of cyberchimps.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cyberchimps.com

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CyberChimps operates in the technology sector, focusing on WordPress theme development. Their competitive advantage lies in offering fast, responsive, and customizable themes that appeal to a broad audience of WordPress users. The business model appears to be freemium, providing free themes with potential premium features or support. The target customers include small to medium businesses and individual developers. The company leverages partnerships with platforms like Trustpilot for reputation management and Google Tag Manager for marketing analytics. Growth indicators include active SEO optimization and integration of popular WordPress plugins. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent operation. The company maintains consistent branding and a professional online presence.

Security posture

The website currently lacks several key security best practices. There are no detected security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are important to mitigate common web attacks. SSL/TLS configuration details are not available from the provided data, but HTTPS is implied by the URL. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Forms and inputs are present but no explicit security measures like CAPTCHA or input validation were observed. Privacy and security policies are absent, which may expose the company to compliance risks, especially under GDPR. Incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not found, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to align with industry standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance website security.
  3. Ensure SSL/TLS is properly configured and enforced site-wide to protect data in transit.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure channels.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CyberChimps
Description
CyberChimps provides responsive, fast, customizable, and free WordPress themes and related services.
Key services
WordPress themes, Theme customization, Support and updates
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Trustpilot widget
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Trustpilot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based theme provider with a focus on responsive design
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page HTML
  3. Uses modern web technologies and SEO plugins
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet
  5. Includes third-party scripts for analytics and reviews (Google Tag Manager, Trustpilot)
  6. No visible security headers or explicit security policies detected in the HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and flexible technical infrastructure. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Trustpilot scripts for analytics and reputation management. The site shows good mobile optimization and SEO practices but lacks explicit accessibility features. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the use of multiple third-party scripts and plugins. There is no indication of advanced hosting provider details or CDN usage from the provided data. Technical debt appears low but could be improved by optimizing script loading and enhancing security configurations. Overall, the technical setup supports the business goals but requires attention to security and privacy compliance to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 88/100Low18 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cyberchimps.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cyberchimps.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.