Skip to main content

Security report for cux.io

CUX Research Sp. z o. o. · Technology · Poland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CUX Research Sp. z o. o. operates a sophisticated digital experience analytics platform that leverages human insight to transform user behavior data into actionable business strategies. Founded in 2014 and headquartered in Poland with offices in Germany and Portugal, CUX serves a medium-sized enterprise clientele including major brands across various industries. Their SaaS model combines advanced web and mobile analytics with expert consultancy to optimize digital experiences and drive measurable growth. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, supported by robust analytics tools like Matomo and Google Tag Manager. Hosting is provided by OVH SAS, a reputable provider. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, CUX emphasizes GDPR compliance, data encryption, role-based access control, and minimal data collection, with a dedicated security page outlining their framework. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers and a vulnerability disclosure policy suggests areas for improvement. Overall, the website presents a professional, trustworthy, and secure digital presence with strong business credibility. Strategic recommendations include enhancing cookie consent mechanisms, publishing incident response contacts, and implementing security headers to further strengthen compliance and security posture.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of cux.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cux.io

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
70
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cux.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
21
Employees
0
Customers
21
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
5%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for cux.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CUX positions itself as a premium provider of digital experience analytics, targeting enterprises seeking to understand and optimize user behavior. Their competitive advantage lies in combining technology with human expertise, offering tailored strategic guidance beyond raw data. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for platform access and consulting services. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem, including HubSpot for marketing and support. Growth indicators include a diverse client base with notable brands and multiple case studies showcasing measurable results. The business model is SaaS-centric with a focus on behavioral insights, appealing to sectors such as finance, e-commerce, and travel.

Security posture

CUX demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, GDPR compliance, data encryption, and role-based access controls. The platform has passed multiple enterprise audits without issues, indicating strong governance. However, the lack of visible security headers and incident response contacts limits transparency. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, which could enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from formalized public policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to harden web security.
  2. Publish a clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy, including security contact emails.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with privacy regulations.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing a dedicated security page with detailed compliance and certification information.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
CUX Research Sp. z o. o.
VAT number
PL8943142798
Registration number
0000792391
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CUX Research Sp. z o. o.
Description
CUX is a digital experience analytics platform that transforms user behavior data into actionable insights to grow businesses, backed by expert support and human insight.
Key services
Web Analytics, Mobile Analytics, Behavioral Insights, Expert Strategic Guidance
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Custom analytics scripts
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Role-based access control
  • Data encryption in transit and at rest
  • GDPR and Privacy by Design compliance
  • Minimal data collection and masking tools
  • Audit trails for governance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on GDPR compliance and security by design.
  3. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected, which could be improved.
  4. Multiple trusted brand clients and case studies enhance credibility.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities found.
  7. Contact information is present but no direct emails or phone numbers visible on main page.
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn and YouTube confirmed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern tech stack with Next.js and React, ensuring fast, responsive, and SEO-friendly pages. Hosting by OVH SAS provides reliable infrastructure. Analytics integration with Matomo and Google Tag Manager supports comprehensive data collection and user tracking. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with no broken elements detected. Technical debt appears minimal, though adding security headers and formalizing privacy mechanisms would improve robustness. Overall, the technical implementation supports business goals effectively with room for incremental security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 80/100Low25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cux.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cux.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.