Skip to main content

Security report for curiositylabptc.com

Curiosity Lab at Peachtree Corners · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Curiosity Lab at Peachtree Corners operates a 5G-enabled living laboratory focused on fostering innovation in IoT, smart city, and autonomous vehicle technologies. The organization provides startups and established companies with a real-world testing environment, including a 3-mile autonomous vehicle roadway and a 25,000 square foot innovation center. The website reflects a mature, well-established entity with strategic partnerships and industry recognition. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and SEO optimization, delivering a good user experience and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are recommended. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in the smart city technology sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching curiositylabptc.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets technology innovators, startups, and international companies seeking a soft landing in North America. Its business model revolves around providing infrastructure and collaborative space for technology development and smart city innovation. The company has established partnerships with major financial and technology firms, enhancing its market position. The website content and awards indicate a strong reputation and active engagement in the smart city ecosystem. Growth indicators include recent press releases and new partner announcements. The partnership ecosystem is robust, supporting a collaborative innovation environment.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers and explicit security policies limits its security maturity. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of consent mechanisms. The site uses Google Analytics, which requires proper user consent under GDPR. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and provide clear contact channels for security issues to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Curiosity Lab at Peachtree Corners
Description
Curiosity Lab is a 5G enabled living laboratory located in Peachtree Corners, providing startups and established companies with resources and infrastructure to develop, test, and validate next generation IoT, smart city, and mobility technologies. It features a 3-mile public autonomous vehicle roadway with advanced C-V2X technology, a 25,000 square foot innovation center, and smart city infrastructure including fiber, intelligent traffic cameras, smart streetlights, and more.
Key services
Innovation Center facilities, Testing environment for IoT and autonomous vehicles, Smart city infrastructure deployment, International launchpad for companies, Partnership and collaboration ecosystem
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Yoast SEO plugin, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, Vimeo embedded video, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Breeze plugin for prefetching, Custom Facebook Feed plugin, Instagram Feed plugin, MicroModal.js
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled (implied by canonical URLs and Google Analytics script loaded over HTTPS)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Breeze for caching and prefetching)
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional, well-maintained WordPress site focused on smart city and technology innovation.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is only via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found on the homepage.
  4. Social media presence is strong with official accounts on LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Vimeo.
  5. No visible security headers detected in the HTML content; recommend adding for enhanced security.
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking, but no visible cookie consent mechanism.
  7. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the business.
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using popular plugins like Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, and Slider Revolution, indicating a well-supported technical infrastructure. The use of Breeze plugin suggests caching and performance optimization efforts. Google Analytics is integrated for traffic analysis. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with structured data (JSON-LD) implemented for SEO benefits. Hosting appears to be with GoDaddy, inferred from WHOIS and nameservers. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and security headers. The technical stack is current but should be monitored for plugin vulnerabilities and updated regularly.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with curiositylabptc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review curiositylabptc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.