Cultural Agents, Inc., NGO · Education · United States
Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.
Cultural Agents, Inc. is a small, US-based non-profit organization founded in 2004 and affiliated with Harvard University. The organization focuses on integrating arts and humanities into civic engagement, targeting academics, artists, community leaders, and active citizens. Their offerings include academic courses, conferences, publications, internships, and a newsletter, positioning them as a niche educational and cultural platform. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and good content quality, supporting their mission and audience engagement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Elementor, Yoast SEO, and event management tools. It is hosted on Bluehost with HTTPS enabled and uses Google reCAPTCHA for form security. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate to good, with SEO practices in place. However, some accessibility features could be improved, and the contact form is currently misconfigured. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and reCAPTCHA but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. The WHOIS data shows domain privacy protection, which is justified for a non-profit entity, and the domain age supports legitimacy. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, but improvements in security policies and incident response disclosures are advised. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and credible platform with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security hardening. Strategic recommendations include publishing clear privacy and cookie policies, fixing contact form issues, enabling DNSSEC, and implementing security headers to strengthen the security posture and user trust.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention culturalagents.org, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for culturalagents.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with culturalagents.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review culturalagents.org.