Skip to main content

Security report for cubegroup.pl

Cube Group · Technology · Poland

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cube Group is a well-established digital and performance marketing agency based in Poland, founded in 2006. The company offers a comprehensive range of services including MarTech, SEO, content marketing, consulting, analytics, CRM, programmatic advertising, and UX/UI design. Their website demonstrates a professional digital presence with rich content, case studies, and modern web technologies such as WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and reCAPTCHA. The technical infrastructure is solid with HTTPS enabled and deferred loading of tracking scripts to optimize performance. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts privacy compliance. Security posture is moderate with no DNSSEC and missing security headers, suggesting room for improvement in hardening the site. Overall, Cube Group presents a credible and professional business with a strong market position in the digital marketing sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cubegroup.pl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
33
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cube Group targets businesses seeking to grow through digital marketing strategies, leveraging technology and data analytics. Their business model focuses on providing integrated marketing solutions that combine strategy, technology, and creative services. The company maintains a medium-sized operation with a consistent brand and a portfolio of notable case studies, indicating a strong market presence. The absence of explicit contact details on the homepage suggests a focus on inbound digital leads rather than direct contact. The company uses advanced marketing tools and tracking technologies, reflecting a mature digital marketing practice. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, which are positive security measures. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduce the overall security posture. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the provided content. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could pose regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to protect against common web attacks.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Conduct a security audit of all forms and inputs to ensure protection against injection and CSRF attacks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Cube Group
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cube Group
Description
W Cube Group budujemy skuteczne strategie wzrostu, wykorzystując digitalowy know-how, technologię i emocje. Wykorzystaj efektywne kanały sprzedaży!
Key services
MarTech, GEO (Generative Engine Optimization), Strategia (Strategy), SEO, Content marketing, Konsulting (Consulting), SEM, Direct Marketing, Analityka i dane (Analytics and Data), Paid Social
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Swiper.js, Contact Form 7, Google reCAPTCHA
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA used
  • Google Tag Manager deferred loading on user interaction

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on homepage or main navigation
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in provided HTML content
  4. Strong focus on digital marketing services with detailed service pages
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; DNSSEC not enabled
  7. No evidence of incident response or security policy documentation
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. No data protection officer contact information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It uses modern JavaScript libraries like Swiper.js for sliders and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tag management. The site is hosted likely via OVH SAS, a reputable hosting provider. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of tracking scripts to optimize user experience. Mobile optimization is good, and the site uses responsive design principles. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are technical risks. No broken elements or errors were detected in the provided content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional digital marketing presence but can be improved in security hardening and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cubegroup.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cubegroup.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.