Skip to main content

Security report for cubecamp.com

CubeCamp · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CubeCamp is a specialized IT studio focused on digital transformation and enterprise-level IT services, catering primarily to businesses lacking extensive internal IT capabilities. Their service portfolio includes full stack development, IT consulting, project auditing, mobile app development, and business analysis. The company maintains a professional online presence with a portfolio showcasing diverse projects across various technologies and industries. Technically, CubeCamp employs a modern technology stack including Node.js, PHP, Java, React, and mobile frameworks such as Ionic and React Native. The website is hosted via Cloudflare, ensuring reliable performance and security. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforcement, reCAPTCHA on forms, and GDPR cookie consent, though improvements are recommended in security headers and formal security policies. Overall, CubeCamp presents a credible and professional business with a solid technical foundation and moderate privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cubecamp.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CubeCamp occupies a niche in the IT services market, targeting enterprises needing digital transformation and IT project support. Their competitive advantage lies in a broad technology stack and experience with enterprise clients, including banking and finance sectors. Revenue streams likely derive from consulting, development contracts, and auditing services. The company operates offices in Latvia and the USA, indicating international reach. The portfolio demonstrates a focus on ERP systems, mobile applications, and logistics solutions. Growth indicators include recent projects and ongoing client engagements. The absence of explicit privacy policies and security disclosures suggests areas for maturity improvement. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data.

Security posture

CubeCamp's security maturity is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and Cloudflare for hosting, which provides baseline protection. The presence of Google reCAPTCHA on contact forms mitigates spam and abuse risks. Cookie consent via Klaro indicates GDPR awareness. However, the lack of DNSSEC, missing security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS), and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts represent gaps. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found, limiting transparency. These factors suggest a need for enhanced security governance and compliance documentation to reduce risk and build trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including a security.txt file.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TWL BA SIA
Registration number
42103092887
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CubeCamp
Description
CubeCamp is an IT studio specializing in digital transformation of businesses, providing enterprise-level IT services including full stack development, IT consulting, project auditing, and management. They focus on companies lacking large IT departments or project delivery experience.
Key services
Development (backend and frontend), Security and GDPR compliance, Mobile app development, Project management, Audit of codebase and infrastructure, Business analysis
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Node.js, Lua, PHP, Java, Python, SQL, NoSQL, React, JavaScript, ExtJS, Cordova, Laravel, Ionic Framework, React Native
Frameworks
Laravel, Ionic Framework, React Native
Platforms
Web, iOS, Android
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA v2 on contact form
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional IT services company site with clear service offerings and portfolio.
  2. Contact information is comprehensive including email, phone, and physical addresses in USA and Latvia.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism implemented via Klaro, indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks with mobile optimization.
  6. Security practices are basic but adequate; improvements recommended in headers and disclosure.
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business consistency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack with a mix of backend languages (Node.js, PHP, Java, Python) and frontend frameworks (React, ExtJS). Mobile development uses React Native and Ionic Framework, indicating cross-platform capabilities. Hosting via Cloudflare provides CDN and security benefits. The site uses OctoberCMS as the content management system. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and Google Fonts. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization is minimal. Technical debt appears low, but security enhancements and formal documentation are recommended to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cubecamp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cubecamp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.