Skip to main content

Security report for cta.tech

Consumer Technology Association (CTA)® · Technology · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Consumer Technology Association (CTA)® is a leading membership organization representing companies in the technology industry, including startups and multinational corporations. It is best known as the organizer of CES®, the world's premier technology event. CTA focuses on advocacy, standards development, research, and member services to support innovation and growth in the technology sector. The website reflects a mature and professional organization with a clear mission to empower technology companies through collaboration and policy influence. The target audience includes technology companies seeking industry advocacy, standards, and networking opportunities. The business model is membership-based, providing services and resources to its members.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cta.tech

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CTA holds a strong market position as a key industry association with over 1200 member companies and multiple divisions, councils, and working groups. Its competitive advantage lies in its advocacy efforts on Capitol Hill, standard-setting activities, and the globally recognized CES event. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, event sponsorships, and research publications. The partnership ecosystem includes event partners and technology companies. Growth indicators include extensive research reports and active member engagement. The organization's operations are well-established with a focus on industry influence and member value.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, the absence of publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The use of multiple third-party tracking and advertising scripts suggests a need for careful privacy management. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security and privacy documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details to improve privacy transparency.
  2. Implement and publicize an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to enhance user privacy and reduce attack surface.
  5. Maintain and regularly audit security headers and SSL configurations to ensure ongoing protection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Consumer Technology Association (CTA)®
Description
The Consumer Technology Association (CTA)® is the leading membership organization for companies in the technology industry and the brand behind CES®. Its mission is to help innovators of all sizes grow their businesses through advocacy, standard setting, and insights.
Key services
Advocacy, Research, Standards development, Events (including CES®), Membership services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Facebook Pixel, Reddit Pixel, Clinch Pixel
Frameworks
Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with proper labeling

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), LinkedIn Analytics, Facebook Analytics, Twitter Analytics, Bing Analytics, Reddit Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Google Ads, Twitter Ads, Facebook Ads, Reddit Ads, Clinch
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Reddit Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
good
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong focus on technology industry advocacy and standards.
  3. Extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the homepage or main navigation.
  5. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  7. Website uses HTTPS with strong security headers.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and legitimate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based frontend with asynchronous loading of multiple analytics and advertising scripts, including Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, Twitter Tag, and Reddit Pixel. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility features and SEO meta tags. Hosting appears to be on a reliable platform with fast content delivery. There is no explicit CMS detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Performance is moderate due to multiple third-party scripts but overall user experience is smooth. Technical risks include reliance on many external tracking services and the absence of visible security and privacy documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cta.tech. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cta.tech.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.