Skip to main content

Security report for crystallinemirrors.com

Crystalline Mirror Solutions · Technology · N/a

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Crystalline Mirror Solutions is a small technology company specializing in crystalline mirror products, currently operating as a subsidiary of Thorlabs. The website serves primarily as a landing page announcing the acquisition by Thorlabs and providing links to products and press releases hosted on the parent company's domain. The technical infrastructure is basic, utilizing Bootstrap for styling and conditional loading of Google Tag Manager for analytics. However, the site lacks HTTPS, which severely impacts its security posture. Security headers are minimal, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating low privacy compliance. The absence of contact information and business details on the site further limits its credibility and user trust. Overall, the website is functional but minimalistic, with significant room for improvement in security, privacy, and content richness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching crystallinemirrors.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
25
Email security
50
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates within the technology sector, focusing on optical components and crystalline mirror solutions. As a subsidiary of Thorlabs, it benefits from the parent company's market position and resources. The business model appears to be B2B, targeting professionals and companies requiring advanced optical solutions. The website's minimal content and lack of direct sales or contact channels suggest it functions more as a brand presence or informational portal rather than a full e-commerce or service platform. The partnership ecosystem is limited to the parent company, with no other partners or subsidiaries indicated. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the website content.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak due to the absence of HTTPS and a valid SSL/TLS certificate, exposing users to potential interception risks. While the site uses Incapsula CDN/WAF, no active blocking or challenge is detected, which is positive but insufficient alone. Security headers are minimal, with only X-XSS-Protection present. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure policies or incident response contacts, which limits transparency and preparedness. Cookies are set for the parent company's domain, which may indicate cross-domain tracking but also potential misconfiguration. Overall, the site requires urgent improvements in encryption, security headers, and privacy compliance to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the site.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Include clear contact information and business details to enhance trust and credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Bootstrap 4.5.2 for styling and vanilla JavaScript for dynamic content loading, including conditional Google Tag Manager analytics. Hosting appears to be behind Incapsula CDN/WAF, providing some protection and performance benefits. However, the site lacks HTTPS, which is a critical technical deficiency. Performance data is unavailable, but the minimal content suggests slow loading possibly due to missing optimization. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced features detected. SEO optimization is poor, with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags present. The site would benefit from modernization, including HTTPS adoption, enhanced SEO, and improved accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with crystallinemirrors.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review crystallinemirrors.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.