Skip to main content

Security report for cryptovoxels.com

Nolan Consulting Limited · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cryptovoxels, operated by Nolan Consulting Limited, is a blockchain-based virtual world platform offering users the ability to explore, buy, and build on virtual parcels of land. The platform targets crypto enthusiasts, gamers, and digital artists, positioning itself as a niche leader in the metaverse and virtual real estate market. Key services include virtual land sales, digital asset marketplaces, and hosting virtual events. The website content is basic but functional, with a consistent brand presence and active social media engagement via Discord and Twitter. Technically, the site uses JavaScript and Leaflet.js for mapping features and employs Plausible Analytics for minimal user tracking. The site performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. However, there is a lack of advanced SEO and security headers, and no cookie consent mechanism is present, indicating room for improvement in privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency and trustworthiness. No contact emails or phone numbers are provided, limiting direct communication channels. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced policies and transparency. The overall risk is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but the absence of WHOIS data and privacy compliance features suggest the need for strategic improvements to enhance trust and security culture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cryptovoxels.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cryptovoxels.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for cryptovoxels.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cryptovoxels operates in the emerging metaverse and blockchain virtual real estate sector, leveraging user-generated content and digital asset marketplaces. Its business model focuses on virtual land ownership and community-driven events, appealing to a tech-savvy audience interested in crypto and gaming. The company maintains a medium-sized operation with a consistent brand and active community engagement. Revenue streams likely include virtual land sales and asset transactions. The lack of detailed business contact information and WHOIS transparency may impact trust with new users. Partnerships appear limited to social platforms like Discord and Twitter, with no identified payment processors or subsidiaries. Growth potential exists given the expanding metaverse market, but strategic focus on compliance and security will be critical.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No explicit incident response or security policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are minimal. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements in transparency, policy publication, and technical security controls to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program.
  3. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance privacy transparency.
  4. Improve domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is available or justified with privacy protection.
  5. Provide clear contact information for security and general inquiries to build trust and facilitate communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nolan Consulting Limited
Description
Cryptovoxels is a virtual world platform where users can explore, buy, and build on virtual parcels of land. It offers assets, collections, events, islands, parcels, spaces, and womps within its ecosystem.
Key services
Virtual land sales, Digital asset marketplace, Virtual events, User-generated content creation
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Leaflet.js, Plausible Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  3. Site uses minimal external scripts and lightweight analytics.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  5. Privacy and terms pages exist but cookie consent is missing.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  7. Content is focused on virtual real estate and blockchain gaming.
  8. Social media presence includes Discord and Twitter links.
  9. No adult or explicit content detected; safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a lightweight JavaScript stack with Leaflet.js for interactive maps and Plausible Analytics for privacy-focused tracking. The HTML structure is valid but basic, with minimal SEO optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate with prefetching of scripts to improve load times. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. The site lacks a CMS indication and does not reveal hosting provider details. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist in enhancing SEO, accessibility, and security configurations. No critical technical risks were identified, but improvements in security headers and privacy mechanisms are recommended to reduce potential attack surfaces.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cryptovoxels.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cryptovoxels.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.