Skip to main content

Security report for crowwithknife.com

crow with knife · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Crow with knife is a niche cryptocurrency token project with a playful brand identity focused on community engagement and multi-chain availability. The website promotes token purchase, bridging, liquidity provision, and merchandise sales, targeting crypto enthusiasts and DeFi users. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies such as React and Next.js, providing a good user experience with mobile optimization and interactive features like a meme builder. However, the site lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and WHOIS transparency, which impacts its overall security posture and compliance. While the presence on multiple reputable crypto exchanges and active social media channels enhances credibility, the absence of domain registration data and security best practices suggests room for improvement. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and security policies, improving security headers, and enhancing transparency around domain registration to build greater trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching crowwithknife.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project operates in the blockchain and cryptocurrency sector, offering a token available on multiple chains including Solana, Base, Cronos, BSC, and Polygon. It leverages partnerships with various decentralized exchanges and trading platforms to facilitate liquidity and trading. The business model centers on tokenomics, community engagement, and merchandise sales. The target audience is crypto investors and NFT collectors. The project appears small in scale but well-branded with consistent messaging and active social media presence. Growth indicators include multi-chain deployment and integration with popular crypto platforms. The ecosystem includes related domains for bridging and merchandise, indicating a diversified approach to revenue streams and user engagement.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a moderate security posture. HTTPS is presumably enabled (based on URL scheme), but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no evidence of privacy or cookie policies, security.txt, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for compliance and incident response readiness. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The site would benefit from implementing security best practices such as CSP, X-Frame-Options, and secure cookie handling, as well as publishing clear privacy and security policies to enhance user trust and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information or use a reputable registrar to improve transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
crow with knife
Description
crow with knife is a digital project centered around a token named 'crow with knife' with a playful tagline 'literally just a crow with a knife'. The site promotes buying the token, bridging it, and building a crow, indicating a crypto or NFT related business model.
Key services
token purchase, token bridging, liquidity provision, merchandise sales, community engagement via social media and Discord
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Vimeo embed, Konva.js (for canvas/meme builder), Tailwind CSS
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a crypto token project with multiple chain support and trading platform listings.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact email is provided but no phone or physical address.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  5. Modern frontend technologies used with good UI/UX design.
  6. No obvious security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
  8. Social media and community links are active and diverse.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js, React, and Tailwind CSS, indicating a modern and maintainable frontend stack. It integrates multimedia content via Vimeo and interactive canvas features via Konva.js. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design principles. External integrations include multiple crypto exchange platforms and social media channels. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. However, no CMS or hosting provider details were identified. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features, and no analytics or tracking services were detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. Technical debt appears low but security and compliance technical implementations need enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with crowwithknife.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review crowwithknife.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.