Skip to main content

Security report for crowdtwist.com

Oracle · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Oracle is a global enterprise technology company specializing in cloud infrastructure, enterprise software, and strategic acquisitions to enhance its product portfolio. The website analyzed focuses on Oracle's strategic acquisitions, highlighting numerous subsidiary companies and their integration into Oracle's ecosystem. The company targets business customers, partners, and investors, positioning itself as a market leader in technology and cloud services. The website content is professionally presented with comprehensive information about acquisitions and support resources. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, jQuery, the Redwood framework, and integrates advanced tag management and consent tools such as Tealium and TrustArc. The site is optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, accessibility, and SEO, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses consent management for cookies, and shows no signs of exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not clearly visible and could be confirmed. The absence of public incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests areas for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and secure, with a high AI-assessed score. The missing WHOIS data is likely due to privacy or registry restrictions and does not detract from the site's legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing transparency around security disclosures and confirming security header implementations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching crowdtwist.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
80
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Oracle maintains a strong market position as a leading enterprise technology provider with a diversified portfolio through strategic acquisitions. Its business model leverages cloud infrastructure, enterprise software, and AI-driven solutions to serve a broad customer base including healthcare, retail, hospitality, and construction sectors. The company benefits from a robust partnership ecosystem and continuous innovation. Revenue streams are diversified across cloud services, software licenses, and support. The acquisition strategy strengthens Oracle's competitive advantage by integrating complementary technologies and expanding market reach. Growth indicators include recent acquisitions like Next Technik and Newmetrix, signaling ongoing investment in emerging technologies.

Security posture

Oracle's website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent management, and no visible sensitive data exposure. The use of third-party security and analytics tools indicates active monitoring and compliance efforts. However, the lack of explicit public incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies represents a compliance gap. Security headers are partially confirmed but should be explicitly verified. The site aligns with GDPR compliance through privacy policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, Oracle exhibits strong security culture and readiness but could improve transparency and communication regarding security incidents and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly document a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and trust.
  2. Explicitly confirm and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear incident response contact information to facilitate security communications and reporting.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities or outdated components are present.
  5. Enhance user education on privacy and security practices through visible site content and resources.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Oracle
Description
By combining with strategic companies, Oracle strengthens its product offerings, accelerates innovation, meets customer demand more rapidly, and expands partner opportunity.
Key services
Cloud Infrastructure, Enterprise Software, ERP Solutions, Healthcare IT, Human Resource Management, AI and Data Science Platforms
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Redwood Framework, Tealium Tag Management, TrustArc Consent Management, Boomerang Performance Monitoring
Frameworks
Redwood
Platforms
Oracle Cloud
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with proper labels

Analytics and tracking

Services
Tealium, Boomerang
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Tealium, Boomerang
Marketing tools
Tealium Tag Management, TrustArc Consent Manager
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about Oracle's strategic acquisitions.
  2. Strong corporate branding and consistent design.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management.
  4. Multiple contact options including sales phone numbers and contact pages.
  5. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and performance monitoring tools.
  7. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy or registry restrictions.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including JavaScript, jQuery, and the Redwood framework, supported by advanced tag management (Tealium) and consent management (TrustArc). Hosting appears to leverage Oracle Cloud and Akamai CDN for performance and reliability. The site demonstrates excellent mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. Performance monitoring is active via Boomerang scripts. No technical debt or legacy technology indicators were found. Opportunities exist to further modernize security header implementations and enhance transparency around security policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with crowdtwist.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review crowdtwist.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.