Skip to main content

Security report for crossdesk.com

Crossdesk Systems · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Crossdesk Systems operates a web-based login portal primarily built on legacy ASP.NET Web Forms technology, serving as an access point for its users or clients. The website content is minimal, focusing solely on user authentication without public-facing business descriptions or policies. The domain is well-established, registered since 2007, indicating a mature presence in its sector. However, the lack of visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies suggests limited public compliance transparency. Technically, the site uses jQuery and standard ASP.NET mechanisms with basic client-side scripting for UI enhancements and session initialization. The absence of modern security headers and advanced security features indicates room for improvement in security posture. No analytics or marketing tools are detected, reflecting a minimalistic approach to user tracking and advertising. Security-wise, the site employs basic protections such as frame busting and password masking but lacks comprehensive HTTP security headers and explicit GDPR compliance indicators. The domain registration status and DNS setup are consistent with a legitimate business, but the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and privacy disclosures. Overall, the website is functional but basic, with moderate trustworthiness based on domain age and registration. Strategic improvements in security, privacy compliance, and user experience would enhance its credibility and resilience against threats.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching crossdesk.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Crossdesk Systems appears to target a niche user base requiring authenticated access to its platform, likely in the technology sector. The business model revolves around user accounts and session management, possibly for software or service delivery. The lack of public business information limits detailed market positioning analysis, but the long domain age suggests established operations. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are disclosed. The minimalistic site design and absence of marketing tools imply a focus on existing users rather than customer acquisition. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the login page alone.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic with some positive elements such as clientTransferProhibited domain status and frame busting scripts to prevent clickjacking. However, the absence of critical security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) and no visible multi-factor authentication or advanced session protections represent vulnerabilities. The site does not display privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and related regulations. Incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present, limiting transparency and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strong TLS configuration and ensure all pages are served securely.
  2. Add comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Introduce multi-factor authentication and enhanced session management controls.
  5. Provide visible contact information and incident response channels to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Crossdesk Systems
Description
Crossdesk Systems appears to provide a login portal likely related to a software or service platform. The site is primarily a login page with no detailed public business description.
Key services
User authentication and session initialization for Crossdesk Systems
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
ASP.NET Web Forms, jQuery, JavaScript
Frameworks
Microsoft ASP.NET
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Frame busting script to prevent clickjacking
  • Password input field masked
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal with minimal public content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the login page.
  3. No contact information or social media links present.
  4. Uses legacy ASP.NET Web Forms technology.
  5. No visible modern security headers or advanced security features.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
  8. Domain WHOIS data indicates a stable and legitimate registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ASP.NET Web Forms, a legacy Microsoft web framework, supplemented by jQuery for client-side scripting. The site uses standard form POST methods with hidden ASP.NET VIEWSTATE and EVENTVALIDATION fields for state management. The hosting and DNS are managed via Network Solutions and amen.fr respectively. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization or modern frontend frameworks detected. Mobile optimization is basic with viewport meta tags but limited responsive design. SEO is minimal with only a title tag and no meta description or structured data. Accessibility features are minimal, relying on basic HTML form controls without ARIA attributes or enhanced navigation aids.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with crossdesk.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review crossdesk.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.