Skip to main content

Security report for crossapp.nl

Cross Approach® van Synanta BV · Technology · Netherlands

High risk. 4 critical or high findings in Network security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cross Approach® is a Dutch SaaS provider specializing in integrated software solutions for quality, safety, and occupational health management (KAM, HSE, QHSE, ARBO). The company offers a comprehensive platform that includes document and process management, registration of work equipment and substances, standard knowledge libraries, dashboards, and mobile app access. Their target audience includes organizations seeking to streamline compliance and certification processes. The website demonstrates a professional market position with clear service offerings and customer testimonials, supported by a consistent brand presence and modern web technologies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

      Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching crossapp.nl

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
85
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
83
Average
61
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector with a focus on compliance and management software. Their business model is subscription-based SaaS targeting small to medium enterprises requiring quality and safety management tools. The presence of certifications such as ISO 9001 and VCA indicates alignment with industry standards. The website shows active marketing and analytics integration, suggesting a growth-oriented approach. Partnerships appear limited to LinkedIn presence and standard third-party service providers. The company is relatively new, founded in 2023, with a clear niche focus and scalable offerings.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration and DNSSEC enabled, indicating strong domain security. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user controls, reflecting GDPR awareness. The use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing tools is balanced with privacy considerations, though no explicit privacy policy or incident response contacts are published. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Security headers are not explicitly listed but DNSSEC and HTTPS provide a solid baseline. Recommendations include publishing formal privacy and security policies and adding a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add terms of service and incident response contact information to enhance legal and security posture.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve inclusiveness and compliance.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and cookies to minimize privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cross Approach® van Synanta BV
Description
Beheer al je KAM-, HSE- en certificeringsprocessen efficiënt met Cross Approach. Alles-in-één tool voor volledige controle en compliance
Key services
Online process management, Document and workflow management, Arbeidsmiddelen- en stoffenregistratie (work equipment and substances registration), Standard knowledge libraries and handbooks, Dashboards with tasks, actions, and reminders, Mobile app for employee access, Incident and deviation reporting module
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, WPBakery Page Builder, FontAwesome, Google Analytics, HubSpot, Cloudflare (likely for CDN and bot management), CookieYes (cookie consent management)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • DNSSEC enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot, Ahrefs Analytics, Leadinfo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
doubleclick.net
Tracking pixels
HubSpot, Leadinfo
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Ahrefs Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and user controls.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Contact information is limited to a contact/demo request form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools with tracking cookies.
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins and scripts.
  7. Business is a small technology SaaS provider focused on quality and safety management software.
  8. Good branding consistency and professional content with customer testimonials.
  9. No security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data detected in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 using WPBakery Page Builder and integrates FontAwesome icons. It leverages multiple third-party services including HubSpot, Google Analytics, Ahrefs Analytics, and CookieYes for cookie management. Hosting is provided by team.blue nl B.V., a reputable registrar and hosting provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses modern JavaScript libraries and CDN services. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve accessibility and formalize security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with crossapp.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review crossapp.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.