Skip to main content

Security report for cron.re

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'cron.re' appears to be a newly launched technology service focused on providing cron-related functionality or tools, as suggested by the site title 'cron'. The domain was registered recently in April 2024, consistent with a new business or product launch. The site uses modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted on Vercel, indicating a contemporary and scalable technical infrastructure. However, the website content is minimal with no descriptive business information, contact details, or legal policies visible, which limits user trust and compliance transparency. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and a domain status that prevents unauthorized transfers, but lacks standard security headers and any visible security or incident response policies. No privacy or cookie policies were found, which is a compliance gap especially under GDPR. The site uses Vercel Analytics for minimal user tracking but does not provide cookie consent mechanisms or detailed privacy disclosures. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid technical foundation but is immature in terms of content, compliance, and security best practices. The absence of contact information and legal policies reduces business credibility and user trust. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and business transparency are recommended to enhance the site's professionalism and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cron.re

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind 'cron.re' is likely a small technology startup or service provider focused on cron job management or scheduling tools, inferred from the site title and domain. The lack of detailed business descriptions or contact information suggests an early-stage or minimal viable product launch. The company targets technology users or developers needing cron-related services. The business model appears to be service or SaaS-oriented but is not explicitly stated. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent company information is available. The site’s minimal content and branding indicate a focus on rapid deployment rather than marketing or customer engagement at this stage.

Security posture

Security maturity is basic with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection active. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a notable gap that could expose the site to common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanisms. The use of Vercel Analytics indicates some user data collection but without clear privacy disclosures. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet industry best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add standard security headers to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to foster transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Vercel Analytics
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Vercel
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Vercel Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Vercel Analytics
Marketing tools
Vercel Analytics
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a newly launched technology service named 'cron'.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms detected on the homepage.
  4. Uses modern React and Next.js framework hosted on Vercel.
  5. HTTPS is enabled with no visible security headers.
  6. Minimal content and no business descriptive text present.
  7. No social media or external business-related links found except Vercel domains.
  8. No security incident or vulnerability disclosure information available.
  9. No advertising or affiliate programs detected except Vercel analytics tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js stack, hosted on Vercel, which provides fast performance and good mobile optimization. The site uses asynchronous JavaScript loading and preloads fonts for performance optimization. Meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards) are properly configured, supporting good search engine visibility. However, the site lacks CMS integration or dynamic content beyond the React framework. No broken elements or errors were detected in the HTML content. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and performant but minimalistic in content and features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cron.re. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cron.re.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.