Skip to main content

Security report for creatomatic.co.uk

Creatomatic · Technology · United Kingdom

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Creatomatic is a Scotland-based digital agency specializing in web design, branding, and digital transformation services, with a focus on WordPress development and digital marketing. The company positions itself as a professional and trusted partner for businesses seeking to build and enhance their digital presence. The website reflects a small-sized agency with a solid reputation, supported by positive user ratings and active social media engagement. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The website is served securely over HTTPS with CDN support, ensuring good performance and availability. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and privacy consent mechanisms implemented, though explicit security headers and detailed privacy or cookie policies are not detected in the provided content. The absence of WHOIS data for the subdomain queried is expected and does not detract significantly from the domain's legitimacy. Overall, Creatomatic demonstrates a professional online presence with moderate technical sophistication and a good security baseline, suitable for its business model and market segment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching creatomatic.co.uk

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
65
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention creatomatic.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for creatomatic.co.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Creatomatic operates in the competitive digital agency market in the UK, targeting businesses requiring web design, branding, and digital transformation services. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on bespoke digital solutions primarily using WordPress. The company benefits from a consistent brand identity and positive customer feedback, which supports its market positioning as a reliable and quality-focused agency. The presence of social media channels and integration of marketing tools suggests an active engagement strategy to attract and retain clients. The lack of detailed business registration or VAT information on the website limits deeper financial or legal insights. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern tracking and analytics tools with an opt-in privacy configuration, reflecting awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options in the provided data indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content analyzed. The lack of visible privacy and cookie policies may pose compliance risks under GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could impact trust and readiness in case of security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but would benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add and configure security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen site security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  4. Publish security and incident response policies or contact channels to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and ensure privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Creatomatic
Description
Scotland based web and design agency specialising in digital transformations, WordPress and branding. We are Creatomatic. We build digital.
Key services
Web design, Branding, Digital transformations, WordPress development, Digital marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, Font Awesome, Leaflet.js, Slick Slider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Privacy consent mechanism with opt-in mode
  • Use of Google Consent Mode

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS query was performed on a subdomain causing failure; domain WHOIS data unavailable.
  3. Website uses modern tracking and analytics tools with opt-in privacy configuration.
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
  6. Social media links to Facebook, Twitter (X), and Instagram are present.
  7. Website is built on WordPress with common plugins and libraries.
  8. No security headers explicitly detected in the provided data; recommend verification.
  9. Content is professional and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress and uses a variety of modern JavaScript libraries and plugins, including jQuery, Leaflet.js for maps, Slick Slider for carousels, and Font Awesome for icons. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing purposes. Hosting is supported by AWS Cloudfront CDN, which aids in performance and availability. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design techniques. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Accessibility features are basic but present. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and script optimization. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small digital agency but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with creatomatic.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review creatomatic.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.