Skip to main content

Security report for createjs.com

gskinner.com, inc. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CreateJS is a technology-focused business providing a suite of modular JavaScript libraries and tools designed to facilitate rich interactive content development on HTML5 platforms. The company, gskinner.com, inc., founded in 2011, maintains a strong market position as a leading solution for HTML5 interactive content and advertising development. Their key services include libraries such as EaselJS, TweenJS, SoundJS, PreloadJS, and the Zoë sprite sheet exporter, targeting developers and designers working with web technologies. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with good content quality and community engagement.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of createjs.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching createjs.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates primarily in the technology sector, focusing on open-source tools and community-driven development. Their business model revolves around providing free libraries with community support and sponsorship, leveraging partnerships with Adobe Animate and other tools. The company maintains an active presence on GitHub and social media platforms, fostering a developer community. The website showcases multiple projects and integrations, indicating a healthy ecosystem and adoption. Growth indicators include recent updates and active community discussions, although direct revenue streams are not explicitly detailed.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited status, indicating a baseline security posture. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security headers were detected, representing areas for improvement. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as lack of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, suggests limited formal compliance and incident response readiness. No forms or sensitive data collection mechanisms were found, reducing immediate risk exposure. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance considerations.
  4. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Provide clear contact information for business and security inquiries to enhance trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
gskinner.com, inc.
Description
A suite of modular libraries and tools which work together or independently to enable rich interactive content on open web technologies via HTML5.
Key services
EaselJS - HTML5 Canvas library, TweenJS - JavaScript tweening and animation, SoundJS - Web audio library, PreloadJS - Asset loading management, Zoë - SWF to sprite sheet exporter
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HTML5 Canvas, jQuery 2.1.4, Google Analytics, Twitter Widgets, Adobe Typekit Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled (implied by https URLs)
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Twitter Widgets
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage content.
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage or metadata.
  3. Social media presence includes Twitter, GitHub, CodePen, Reddit, Google Plus (legacy), and Stack Overflow.
  4. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and fonts, with CDN usage for performance.
  5. No forms detected on the homepage; no data collection forms present.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. WHOIS data shows domain is locked against deletion, transfer, and update, indicating good domain security practices.
  8. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in the provided data; potential area for improvement.
  10. Website content is rich with detailed descriptions of libraries and tools, demos, downloads, and community engagement.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript technology stack including CreateJS libraries, jQuery, Google Analytics, and Adobe Typekit fonts. It is hosted on DreamHost, a reputable provider. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with CDN usage for key scripts and assets. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or static site architecture. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 50/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with createjs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review createjs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.