Skip to main content

Security report for cre.ma

크리마(CREMA) · Technology · South Korea

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

크리마(CREMA) is an AI-driven review marketing platform focused on providing e-commerce businesses in South Korea with data-based solutions to enhance customer review management and marketing effectiveness. The website presents a professional and modern design, leveraging technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Channel.io for analytics and customer engagement. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data and domain details introduces uncertainty regarding the domain's legitimacy and ownership transparency. The site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts its compliance posture. Security headers are not detected, and SSL configuration details are unavailable, suggesting room for improvement in security hardening. Overall, the platform appears credible in its business offering but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cre.ma

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a key player in the AI-powered review marketing sector, targeting online shopping mall operators and marketing professionals. Its business model revolves around providing AI analytics and marketing tools to drive sustainable growth cycles for e-commerce businesses. The website content is consistent and well-branded, with clear messaging in Korean. The use of modern marketing and analytics tools indicates a digitally mature infrastructure. However, the lack of visible contact information and corporate registration details limits full business credibility assessment. There are no identified partnerships or subsidiaries linked via domain analysis.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate but incomplete. While HTTPS is presumably enabled (inferred from canonical URLs using https), no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected in the provided data. The site uses third-party scripts which should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. Absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, especially under GDPR or similar regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a risk for timely vulnerability reporting and mitigation. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing security best practices and transparency in data protection.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
크리마(CREMA)
Description
크리마는 고객 리뷰 데이터를 기반으로 쇼핑몰 성장의 핵심 솔루션을 제공하는 ‘AI 리뷰 마케팅 플랫폼'입니다. 크리마 서비스로 지속 가능한 성장 사이클을 만들어보세요!
Key services
AI 리뷰 분석, 리뷰 마케팅 솔루션, 데이터 기반 성장 지원
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Channel.io plugin, Framer (website generator), Google Fonts
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing
  • Use of asynchronous script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Channel.io
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided in the visible content.
  5. Website uses modern technologies and marketing tools like Google Tag Manager and Channel.io.
  6. Content is in Korean and targets e-commerce businesses for AI-powered review marketing.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL status unknown.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is business and technology focused.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Framer, a modern web design and prototyping tool, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Channel.io for analytics and customer engagement. The site uses Google Fonts for typography and loads scripts asynchronously to optimize performance. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices. However, no CMS beyond Framer is detected, and hosting provider details are not available. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and SEO. The absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data are technical risks that should be addressed to enhance overall site robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cre.ma. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cre.ma.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.