Skip to main content

Security report for cqql.site

Njalla Okta LLC · Technology · Saint Kitts and Nevis

Partial score · DNS & email only

53/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website cqql.site is a personal technical blog operated by an individual or small entity registered as Njalla Okta LLC in Saint Kitts and Nevis. The site focuses on technology-related content including hacking tutorials, generative art, CTF writeups, and queer/trans community resources. It serves a niche audience of technology enthusiasts and members of the queer/trans community interested in technical topics. The business model is content publishing and community engagement without evident commercial transactions. The domain is newly registered in May 2024 with privacy protection, consistent with the website's privacy-conscious theme. Technically, the site is a static HTML/CSS site hosted via Njalla, a privacy-focused hosting provider. The site is basic but functional with good content relevance and navigation clarity. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but adequate. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. Performance is likely fast due to static content delivery. SEO and metadata are minimal but present. From a security perspective, the site lacks HTTPS enforcement information and security headers in the provided data, which lowers its security posture. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating limited compliance with privacy regulations. No forms or data collection mechanisms are detected, reducing exposure to input-based vulnerabilities. The domain registration is legitimate and consistent with the website content and operator profile. No WAF or blocking mechanisms are detected. Overall, the site is a safe, niche personal blog with moderate trustworthiness but could improve security and privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS with HSTS, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing vulnerability disclosure and incident response information to enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cqql.site

This scan found 15 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
Average
53

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a small-scale personal technical blog targeting a niche audience interested in hacking, generative art, and queer/trans community resources. It leverages a privacy-focused hosting provider and registrar, aligning with a privacy-conscious business ethos. The business model centers on content publishing and community engagement rather than direct monetization. The site links to various partner and community domains, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators are limited due to the site's recent creation in 2024. The lack of commercial elements suggests a focus on knowledge sharing and community support rather than revenue generation. The site maintains moderate branding consistency and trust indicators through active social media presence and technical content quality.

Security posture

The security posture of cqql.site is moderate but with notable gaps. The absence of HTTPS enforcement details and security headers reduces protection against common web attacks. The domain registration includes transfer and update prohibitions, which is a positive control. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, limiting transparency and preparedness. No forms or input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user interaction. The site does not appear to collect personal data, mitigating privacy risks. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing modern security best practices including HTTPS with HSTS, Content Security Policy, and clear privacy and security policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with HSTS to ensure secure communications.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features for better user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Njalla Okta LLC
Description
Personal/technical blog and resource site focused on technology, hacking, generative art, CTF writeups, and queer/trans community resources.
Key services
Technical articles, CTF writeups, Community resource links, Contact and social media engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, Static site
Performance
fast
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited set

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal technical blog with focus on hacking, generative art, and queer/trans community resources.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact info includes email and multiple social media platforms.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected.
  5. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement info found in provided data.
  7. Domain registered recently with privacy-focused registrar Njalla.
  8. Website content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a static HTML/CSS site with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. It is hosted by Njalla, a privacy-focused provider, with domain registration also through Njalla Okta LLC. The site uses basic meta tags and minimal SEO features. Performance is likely fast due to static content delivery. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. No analytics or advertising scripts are present, indicating minimal tracking. The technical stack is simple and low risk but could be modernized with HTTPS enforcement and security headers. The site’s technical debt is low given its simplicity but lacks advanced features or automation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cqql.site. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cqql.site.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.