Skip to main content

Security report for cppreference.com

cppreference.com · Technology · N/a

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

cppreference.com is a well-established online reference platform dedicated to providing comprehensive documentation and reference materials for the C and C++ programming languages. It serves a global audience of developers and programmers seeking authoritative and detailed information on language features, standard libraries, and technical specifications. The site operates primarily as a free resource supported by advertising and community contributions, positioning itself as a key knowledge base in the programming community. Technically, the website is built on the MediaWiki platform, leveraging technologies such as jQuery and MathJax for enhanced content presentation. Hosting is provided by Tiger Technologies, and the site demonstrates good performance and basic mobile optimization. SEO practices are adequately implemented, and the content is well-structured and professionally presented, contributing to a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks several important security headers and does not publish explicit security or incident response policies. There is no cookie consent mechanism despite the presence of advertising and tracking scripts, indicating partial privacy compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected, but improvements in security best practices and privacy compliance are recommended. Overall, cppreference.com is a trustworthy and valuable resource with excellent content quality and business credibility. Strategic enhancements in security headers, privacy policies, and incident response transparency would further strengthen its security posture and compliance standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cppreference.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cppreference.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
547
Employees
0
Customers
505
Third parties
42
Weak passwords
16%

10 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for cppreference.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

cppreference.com occupies a niche as a specialized technical reference site for C and C++ programmers worldwide. Its competitive advantage lies in the depth and breadth of its documentation, covering multiple language standards and compiler support details. The business model is non-commercial, relying on advertising and community support rather than direct revenue streams. The target audience includes software developers, educators, and students in the programming domain. The site shows indicators of stable growth and community engagement, with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. Its operations are streamlined and focused on content delivery rather than commercial expansion.

Security posture

The security maturity of cppreference.com is moderate. The site enforces HTTPS, which is fundamental, but lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is partial, with no cookie consent mechanism despite the use of tracking and advertising scripts. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The overall security posture would benefit from adopting standard security headers, publishing security policies, and implementing privacy consent mechanisms to align with GDPR and other regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Add a cookie policy page and implement a consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations such as GDPR.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly update MediaWiki and all dependencies to the latest secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience across devices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
cppreference.com
Description
An online reference site providing comprehensive documentation and reference material for the C and C++ programming languages, including language features, standard libraries, and technical specifications.
Key services
C++ language reference, C language reference, Standard library documentation, Technical specifications and compiler support information
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
MediaWiki 1.21.2, jQuery, MathJax, GeSHi syntax highlighter
Frameworks
MediaWiki
Performance
fast
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Carbon Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a comprehensive and authoritative reference for C and C++ programming languages.
  2. Content is well-structured and extensive with clear navigation.
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected despite presence of tracking and ads.
  4. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts published.
  5. Use of standard open-source technologies and hosting by a known provider.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

cppreference.com is powered by MediaWiki 1.21.2, an established open-source wiki platform. The site uses jQuery and MathJax for dynamic content rendering and mathematical notation support. Hosting is provided by Tiger Technologies, a known hosting provider. The website loads quickly and has a well-structured HTML layout with proper meta tags supporting SEO. However, the site shows basic mobile optimization and accessibility features, indicating room for modernization. There is no evidence of a modern frontend framework or advanced performance optimization techniques. Technical debt may exist due to the older MediaWiki version, suggesting an opportunity for platform upgrade to improve security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cppreference.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cppreference.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.