Skip to main content

Security report for corgea.com

Corgea · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Corgea is an AI-driven security platform focused on automatically detecting, triaging, and fixing insecure code, targeting developers and security teams. The company appears to be a small technology startup founded in 2020, offering SaaS solutions in the cybersecurity domain. The website is professionally designed using Framer, with good content relevance and user experience, though it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies as well as contact information. Technically, the site uses modern analytics and marketing tools such as HubSpot and Google Analytics, but lacks security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended for enhanced security. The domain registration is consistent and transparent, registered with NameCheap since 2020, aligning with the company's startup profile. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching corgea.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention corgea.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for corgea.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Corgea operates in the AI-powered cybersecurity sector, providing automated code security solutions. Its business model is SaaS-based, targeting software developers and security teams who need to identify and remediate insecure code efficiently. The company is positioned as an emerging player leveraging AI technology to differentiate itself. The website's marketing ecosystem includes HubSpot and LinkedIn tracking, indicating a focus on B2B lead generation and customer engagement. The lack of detailed contact and compliance information suggests the company may be in early growth stages or prioritizing product development over formal compliance disclosures. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protection, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No forms or input fields were detected, minimizing immediate risks from form-based vulnerabilities, but the extensive use of third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy concerns. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which is a gap in security readiness and transparency. The site should improve its security headers and provide clear policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  4. Add clear contact information including support and security incident response contacts to enhance transparency and customer confidence.
  5. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve site performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Corgea
Description
Corgea is an AI-powered security platform that automatically finds, triages, and fixes insecure code. Sign up today for free to try Corgea.
Key services
AI-powered security platform, Automatic insecure code detection, Triage and fix insecure code
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, HubSpot scripts, Google Analytics, Framer (website generator), JavaScript, Web fonts (Inter, IBM Plex Mono, Aeonik Medium)
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Ads Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Vector Analytics Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional AI security platform targeting developers and security teams.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or in metadata.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the provided HTML content.
  4. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts are used, including HubSpot and Google Analytics.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data; DNSSEC is not enabled.
  6. Domain is registered with NameCheap, created in 2020, expiring in 2025, with clientTransferProhibited status.
  7. Website uses Framer for site generation and hosting.
  8. No visible forms or form fields detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Framer, a modern web design and hosting platform, and integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, HubSpot, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site uses modern web fonts and asynchronous script loading to optimize performance. However, no explicit CMS beyond Framer was detected. The domain is registered with NameCheap and is not using DNSSEC, which is a recommended security enhancement. The site appears moderately optimized for mobile and SEO, but lacks accessibility features and security headers. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements by optimizing third-party scripts and implementing security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with corgea.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review corgea.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.