Skip to main content

Security report for coomeet.me

Domains By Proxy, LLC · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CooMeet is a well-established online platform providing random video chat services primarily targeting adult users seeking live video communication with women worldwide. The business operates a freemium model with premium subscriptions and paid minute packages, supported by mobile applications on iOS and a web platform. The company positions itself as a leading service in the random video chat market with over 9 million users and a strong trust score based on user reviews. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS, and Google marketing tools, delivering a responsive and user-friendly experience with moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections in place, though it lacks some advanced security headers and public incident response information. Privacy compliance is supported by a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and a detailed privacy policy, indicating GDPR awareness. Overall, the site demonstrates good business credibility and technical maturity, with room for improvement in security transparency and contact information availability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching coomeet.me

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
65
Email security
65
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CooMeet operates in the technology sector, focusing on online dating and social interaction via video chat. Its competitive advantage lies in offering unrestricted, anonymous 1-on-1 video chats with real women, supported by automatic translation and private rooms. The business model combines free access with premium paid features, generating revenue through subscriptions and minute packages. The platform's global reach is evidenced by multi-language support and a large user base. Partnerships with app stores and use of Google Ads indicate a mature marketing ecosystem. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is standard for consumer-facing services, balancing transparency and privacy. Growth indicators include a large monthly chat volume and expanding geographic coverage. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing security transparency and expanding contact channels to improve user trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain status protections to prevent unauthorized changes. However, it lacks explicit advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options in the HTML content. No security.txt or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and readiness for vulnerability reporting. The cookie consent mechanism is robust, supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with recommendations to publish security policies, add security headers, and provide clear incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a security.txt file with incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts.
  2. Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy and other security headers to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including security and abuse email addresses on the website.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance disclosures with detailed data retention and processing policies.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve performance.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Domains By Proxy, LLC
Registration number
Registration Number is
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Domains By Proxy, LLC
Description
CooMeet offers a premium live video chat with girls worldwide with features like 1-on-1 video calls, automatic message translation, private rooms, and anonymity.
Key services
Random video chat with girls, Live 1-on-1 video calls, Premium subscription plans, Mobile apps for iOS and Android
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager, Google Ads Conversion Tracking, Lazy loading images, Responsive CSS
Platforms
Web, iOS app, Android app (link disabled)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited etc.
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website offers random video chat service focused on adult users
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism present
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main page
  4. Mobile app available on iOS, Android link disabled
  5. Uses Google Ads and Tag Manager for marketing and analytics
  6. No visible security.txt or incident response info
  7. WHOIS privacy protection used but justified
  8. Good branding and trust indicators visible
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with lazy loading and responsive design, ensuring good mobile optimization. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. Google Tag Manager and Google Ads are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site lacks a detected CMS, indicating a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include reliance on third-party scripts and absence of some security headers, which could be addressed to improve resilience and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with coomeet.me. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review coomeet.me.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.