Skip to main content

Security report for cookietractor.com

CookieTractor · Technology · Sweden

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CookieTractor is a specialized European SaaS provider offering a user-friendly, legally compliant cookie consent solution tailored for website owners who need to meet GDPR and ePrivacy Directive requirements. The company emphasizes accessibility, supporting WCAG 2.2 AAA standards and the European Accessibility Act, making their product suitable for a wide audience including those with disabilities. Their market position is strengthened by references to reputable clients such as Volvo Car Retail, UNICEF Sweden, and the Swedish Government, indicating trust and reliability in their niche. The business model is subscription-based with tiered pricing according to website size, targeting small to medium enterprises and organizations requiring robust cookie management solutions. Technically, the website is built on ASP.NET Core with a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery and integrates analytics tools like Google Analytics and Matomo. Hosting and CDN services are provided via Cloudflare, ensuring fast global delivery and security benefits. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with a clean, professional design and clear navigation. Cookie consent is implemented with a detailed banner that blocks non-essential cookies until user consent is given, demonstrating strong privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS exclusively and employs anti-forgery tokens in forms, indicating good security hygiene. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are not detected, representing an area for improvement. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable anomaly that reduces trustworthiness and should be investigated further to confirm domain legitimacy. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are published, with contact primarily via web forms. Overall, CookieTractor presents a mature, professional, and privacy-conscious offering with strong technical and compliance foundations. The main risk lies in the lack of publicly available domain registration data, which could impact trust for some users. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy or incident response page, and improving transparency around company contact information to bolster business credibility and trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of cookietractor.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 15 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cookietractor.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CookieTractor operates in the technology sector, focusing on privacy compliance and accessibility for cookie consent management. Their competitive advantage lies in their strong compliance with European regulations and accessibility standards, as well as their automated cookie scanning and multi-language support. The SaaS subscription model with clear pricing tiers based on page volume suggests predictable revenue streams. The target customers are website owners and organizations needing GDPR-compliant cookie solutions, including government and non-profit sectors as evidenced by client references. The company has established partnerships or client relationships with notable European entities, enhancing their market credibility. Growth indicators include thousands of implementations and continuous feature development such as dark mode support and EU-only data delivery options. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with analytics and marketing platforms like Google Analytics, Matomo, and Hubspot. Operationally, the company is focused on European data privacy and sustainability, positioning itself as a responsible and compliant vendor in the privacy tech market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling via anti-forgery tokens. The cookie consent mechanism ensures that no non-essential cookies are set before user consent, aligning with GDPR requirements. Use of Cloudflare provides additional protection against bots and DDoS attacks. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response information limits transparency and preparedness perception. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure program is evident. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by implementing recommended headers and publishing security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and readiness for security events.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure program, including a security.txt file, to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide direct company contact information such as verified emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion among users and partners.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CookieTractor
Description
CookieTractor is a cookie consent solution done right – straightforward yet powerful and full-featured. WCAG 2.2 AAA compliant.
Key services
Cookie consent banner, Cookie scanning and automatic cookie listing, Multi-language support, Accessibility compliance, Customization of cookie banner appearance, Blocking of third-party cookies (YouTube, Vimeo) until consent
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery 2.2.4, Matomo Tag Manager, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare (inferred from cookies), ASP.NET Core (inferred from cookies)
Frameworks
ASP.NET Core
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with anti-forgery tokens
  • Cookie consent mechanism blocking non-essential cookies until consent
  • Use of Cloudflare for DDoS and bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Hubspot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides a comprehensive cookie consent solution focused on legal compliance and accessibility.
  2. Strong emphasis on GDPR and ePrivacy Directive compliance.
  3. High accessibility standards including WCAG 2.2 AAA and European Accessibility Act compliance.
  4. Clear and professional design with multi-language support.
  5. Use of reputable analytics and marketing tools with transparent cookie policies.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact primarily via web form.
  7. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern ASP.NET Core framework with client-side JavaScript including jQuery 2.2.4. It uses Cloudflare CDN for hosting and performance optimization, ensuring fast global content delivery. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and Matomo, with marketing tools including Hubspot and Google Ads. The site is mobile-optimized and meets high accessibility standards (WCAG 2.2 AAA). The cookie consent solution is sophisticated, featuring automatic cookie scanning, multi-language support, and blocking of third-party cookies until consent. Performance is optimized with client files under 20 kB and EU-only data delivery options. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of explicit security headers and missing WHOIS data represent risks. Opportunities exist to modernize security posture and improve transparency to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 79/100Low28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cookietractor.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cookietractor.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.