Skip to main content

Security report for cookieslista.cz

Cookies lišta, s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cookies lišta, s.r.o. is a Czech-based small technology company specializing in providing comprehensive cookie consent and GDPR compliance solutions tailored for websites. Their offerings include a cookie consent bar, privacy policy generator, and ongoing legislative and technological updates, positioning them as a niche player in the compliance software market. The company collaborates with legal experts and web design studios to ensure both legal accuracy and technical quality. Their market focus is primarily on Czech businesses needing to comply with evolving cookie legislation effective from 2022 and beyond. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages modern JavaScript libraries and third-party services such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Smartsupp live chat. The site demonstrates good SEO practices, mobile optimization, and a user-friendly interface with clear navigation and professional design. Consent management is robust, with scripts loaded conditionally based on user consent, reflecting a mature digital compliance posture. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements consent-based script loading to protect user privacy. However, no explicit security headers were detected, suggesting room for improvement in hardening the site against common web threats. The absence of WHOIS data due to privacy protection is typical for small businesses and does not raise immediate concerns given the professional presentation and clear contact information. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong compliance focus, good technical implementation, and transparent business operations. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, maintaining up-to-date third-party script audits, and possibly publishing a formal security policy to further build trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cookieslista.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cookies lišta operates in the technology sector, focusing on legal compliance solutions for cookie management and GDPR adherence. Their business model revolves around selling licenses for their cookie consent software and related services, including legal text generation and updates. The company targets small to medium-sized businesses in the Czech Republic that require compliance with new cookie legislation. Their competitive advantage lies in combining legal expertise with technical implementation, supported by partnerships with law firms and web design agencies. Revenue streams include license sales, renewal fees, and optional professional installation services. The partnership ecosystem includes payment processors like GoPay and marketing analytics providers. Growth indicators include multi-license discounts and ongoing legislative updates, positioning them well for sustained demand in privacy compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly enforced, and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented to comply with GDPR requirements. The conditional loading of tracking and marketing scripts based on user consent is a positive privacy practice. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others indicates potential gaps in defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Incident response and security policy documentation are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could benefit from additional hardening and formal security governance disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with web standards and user inclusivity.
  5. Consider adding a dedicated data protection officer contact or privacy contact point to align with GDPR best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Cookies lišta, s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cookies lišta, s.r.o.
Description
Poskytuje komplexní řešení cookies lišty a související legislativy včetně GDPR pro weby, s aktualizacemi a podporou.
Key services
Cookies lišta kompatibilní s legislativou 2025, Generátor zásad ochrany osobních údajů, Aktualizace legislativy a technologie, Profesionální instalace a podpora
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Smartsupp Live Chat, WordPress
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress, Custom JavaScript API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • Scripts loaded conditionally based on consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Smartsupp Live Chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website fully accessible with rich content and clear business focus
  2. Strong emphasis on GDPR and cookie compliance for Czech market
  3. Multiple consent management scripts and cookie categories implemented
  4. Clear contact and ordering forms with validation
  5. Use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing tools
  6. No WHOIS data available, indicating privacy protection
  7. Professional design and SEO optimization evident
  8. No security headers detected in provided data, potential improvement area
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern JavaScript-based front end. It uses popular analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Smartsupp live chat, all integrated with consent management to respect user privacy. The site loads scripts conditionally based on user consent, demonstrating a mature approach to privacy compliance. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and responsive design for mobile devices. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The site uses standard web technologies including jQuery and CSS with custom styling. There is no explicit hosting provider information detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid, though improvements in security headers and accessibility could be made.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 51/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cookieslista.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cookieslista.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.