Skip to main content

Security report for contentkingapp.com

ContentKing · Technology · Netherlands

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ContentKing operates a cloud-based SaaS platform specializing in real-time SEO auditing and website monitoring, branded as Conductor Website Monitoring. The company targets SEO professionals, marketing managers, technical SEOs, content teams, developers, and executives, offering services such as 24/7 SEO auditing, alerting, content change tracking, and log file analysis. The platform is trusted by over 2,000 customers including major global brands, indicating a strong market position and credibility. The website content is professional, well-structured, and optimized for SEO and mobile devices, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the website leverages modern analytics and marketing technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Intercom, with a fast performance and good accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, though explicit security headers and policies could be more clearly documented. Privacy compliance is robust, with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and active consent mechanisms, aligning with GDPR requirements. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which limits verification of domain registration legitimacy. However, the website's branding, contact information, and business details strongly support its authenticity. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access and analysis. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, security awareness, and compliance, suitable for its target audience and business model.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching contentkingapp.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ContentKing's market positioning is strong within the SEO and digital marketing technology sector, offering a SaaS platform that addresses critical needs for real-time website monitoring and SEO auditing. Their competitive advantage lies in 24/7 monitoring capabilities, actionable insights, and integration options. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for their SaaS services. The target customer segments are diverse, spanning agencies, eCommerce, publishers, and technical SEO teams. The partnership ecosystem includes major brands and industry experts, enhancing credibility and reach. Strategic observations include a focus on continuous innovation, customer trust through transparency, and leveraging expert endorsements to maintain market leadership.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure handling of user inputs in forms. Use of Sentry for error monitoring indicates proactive incident detection. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly documented, suggesting room for improvement in transparency and preparedness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly document security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain compliance with evolving regulations and best practices.
  5. Enhance security culture by communicating security practices and certifications to customers and stakeholders.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ContentKing
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ContentKing
Description
Conductor Website Monitoring keeps track of your website 24/7 so that you can catch unexpected changes and issues before search engines and visitors do.
Key services
24/7 SEO Auditing, SEO Monitoring, SEO Alerting, Content Change Tracking, Log File Analysis, Insights & Reporting, APIs & Integrations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Sentry, Intercom, Tapfiliate, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Cookies, Microsoft Advertising Cookies
Platforms
Cloud-based SaaS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with validation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Facebook
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn, Microsoft Advertising, Intercom
Marketing tools
Intercom
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong branding and trust signals with major customer logos and expert endorsements.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  4. Use of modern analytics and marketing technologies with transparent disclosures.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration trust verification.
  7. Website is well optimized for SEO, mobile, and accessibility.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Sentry for monitoring. It employs asynchronous loading of scripts to optimize performance and uses responsive design techniques for excellent mobile optimization. The presence of multiple tracking and marketing tools indicates a sophisticated digital marketing infrastructure. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The website demonstrates fast loading times and good accessibility features, with clear navigation and structured content. Technical risks are minimal but could be mitigated further by enhancing security headers and publishing security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with contentkingapp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review contentkingapp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.