Skip to main content

Security report for confluxnetwork.org

Conflux · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Conflux Network is a blockchain platform focused on building a multi-chain ecosystem that enables creators, communities, and markets to connect globally, with a unique position as the only regulatory compliant chain in China. The platform offers high throughput, security via PoW consensus, interoperability through its ShuttleFlow cross-chain bridge, scalability, built-in staking with attractive annualized interest, and low fees via a fee sponsorship mechanism. The target audience includes developers, crypto projects, and users seeking access to the Asian blockchain market. The website is professionally designed, mobile optimized, and rich in developer resources and community engagement channels. Technically, it uses modern frameworks like Next.js and React, hosted with Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Business credibility is supported by consistent branding, active social media presence, and transparent token economy information. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned in the blockchain industry.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching confluxnetwork.org

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Conflux Network operates in the blockchain technology sector, targeting developers and crypto projects aiming to enter the Asian market, especially China. Its competitive advantage lies in regulatory compliance within China, high throughput via a novel consensus algorithm, and interoperability with other chains. The business model revolves around providing blockchain infrastructure, staking services, and developer grants, generating revenue through token economics and ecosystem growth. Partnerships with wallet providers like Fluent Wallet and presence on major social platforms indicate a growing ecosystem. The company was founded in 2020 and maintains a medium-sized operation with a focus on innovation and community building. Strategic observations include the importance of expanding developer tools, enhancing security transparency, and improving privacy compliance to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. The use of a well-known registrar and Cloudflare DNS adds to domain security, though DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended improvement. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could be a compliance gap. The absence of security headers like CSP or HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the scripts. Privacy compliance is minimal, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and detailed GDPR adherence statements. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be enhanced by adopting additional security headers, publishing incident response procedures, and implementing privacy best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Conflux
Description
Conflux Network is building a multi-chain ecosystem to enable creators, communities, and markets to connect globally across borders and protocols. It is the only regulatory compliant chain in China, facilitating entry to the Asian market for globally minded crypto projects.
Key services
Blockchain infrastructure, Cross-chain asset bridge (ShuttleFlow), Staking with annualized interest, Developer tools and grants, Wallet creation (Fluent Wallet)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is rich and well-structured with clear business focus.
  3. Strong presence of developer resources and community engagement.
  4. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond basic privacy and terms pages.
  5. No phone numbers or physical addresses disclosed.
  6. Social media presence is extensive and consistent with blockchain projects.
  7. No cookie consent mechanism detected.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  9. Domain uses privacy protection but is consistent with industry norms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, ensuring server-side rendering and good SEO performance. Hosting uses Cloudflare DNS and likely CDN services, contributing to fast load times and global availability. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessible navigation. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or headless architecture. Performance is fast with preloaded CSS and deferred scripts. Technical risks are low, but the absence of some security headers and privacy mechanisms indicates areas for modernization. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust and supports the business goals effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with confluxnetwork.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review confluxnetwork.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.