Skip to main content

Security report for confea.net

Topinfo s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Confea is an online event management software platform developed and offered by Topinfo s.r.o., a Czech company. The platform supports comprehensive conference and congress organization processes including author registration, submission, review, program planning, participant registration, and event material preparation. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and targets event organizers ranging from small to large scale events. The business model is SaaS with tiered pricing based on event size and features used. The company has a solid market presence in the Czech Republic and internationally, with a history dating back to 2006. Technically, the website uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap, and a proprietary CMS (Topinfo CMS). The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized, though some technologies like jQuery are somewhat dated. Performance is moderate, and accessibility is basic but functional. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach but also a lack of marketing automation. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are compliance gaps especially under GDPR. The contact form uses client-side validation but no advanced security features are evident. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration status. This discrepancy between the professional website and missing domain registration data reduces overall trust. Overall, Confea presents a professional and functional event management solution with good business credibility but needs improvements in security posture, privacy compliance, and domain registration transparency to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching confea.net

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Confea operates in the event management software market, targeting institutions and companies organizing conferences and congresses. Its competitive advantage lies in offering an integrated, web-based system covering the entire event lifecycle from submission to feedback. The tiered pricing model allows scalability for different event sizes. The company leverages partnerships and brand trust with reputable Czech and international clients. Growth indicators include a long operational history and multiple extending modules. The business ecosystem includes its parent company Topinfo s.r.o. and related domains for language localization. Revenue streams are primarily license fees for software usage. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing compliance and security to maintain market position and customer trust.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate but with notable gaps. The absence of security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options exposes the site to potential risks like clickjacking and content injection. The lack of visible privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting readiness for security events. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries may introduce vulnerabilities. However, the site uses HTTPS (assumed) and client-side form validation. Overall, the security culture appears basic and would benefit from formal policies, improved technical controls, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Verify domain registration status and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to improve trust.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response plan and security contact information.
  5. Update JavaScript libraries and CMS components regularly to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Topinfo s.r.o.
Description
Unique on-line service for conferences, summits and congresses organizing. A comfortable Web-based system to support conference organization including author registration, contribution submission, review process, program planning, participant registration, and preparation of event materials.
Key services
Event website creation, Author registration and submission, Review and evaluation management, Program planning, Participant registration, Certificate issuance, Feedback collection
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, Bootstrap, jQuery Migrate, Fancybox 2.1.5, Topinfo CMS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed but not confirmed from data
  • Form validation with jQuery Validate plugin

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about event management software
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and contact form
  4. No security headers or advanced security policies detected
  5. WHOIS data missing, raising domain legitimacy concerns
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected
  7. Website uses older jQuery version but modern Bootstrap framework
  8. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a proprietary CMS (Topinfo CMS) with frontend technologies including jQuery 1.12.4, Bootstrap, and Fancybox for UI components. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of some scripts. Accessibility is basic but present. There is no evidence of advanced analytics or marketing automation tools. The lack of security headers and outdated libraries represent technical debt and potential risks. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Modernization opportunities include upgrading JavaScript libraries, implementing security best practices, and enhancing privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with confea.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review confea.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.