Skip to main content

Security report for conduit.xyz

Conduit XYZ · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Conduit XYZ is a technology company specializing in providing powerful blockchain infrastructure solutions, including customizable chains, RPC nodes, account abstraction, and indexing services. Positioned as a leading provider in the Ethereum ecosystem, Conduit powers over 55% of chains on Ethereum with more than 60 mainnets deployed and a total value locked exceeding $4 billion. Their target audience includes teams building high-performance onchain applications across DeFi, TradFi, gaming, and other sectors. The company emphasizes rapid deployment and scalability of onchain applications backed by enterprise-grade infrastructure. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, JavaScript, and JSON-LD structured data, hosted on Webflow's platform. The site demonstrates excellent design quality, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. Analytics are implemented via Plausible Analytics, reflecting a privacy-conscious approach with minimal user tracking. However, explicit privacy and cookie policies are not found, and no cookie consent mechanism is implemented. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Security headers are not explicitly detected, and there is no published security policy or incident response information. The absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files suggests room for improvement in transparency and security communication. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in its market niche. The lack of explicit privacy and security policies slightly reduces compliance scores but does not significantly impact the overall credibility. Strategic recommendations include adding comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, and publishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching conduit.xyz

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Conduit operates in the blockchain infrastructure sector, offering essential services that enable rapid deployment and scaling of custom chains and developer tools. Their business model revolves around providing infrastructure-as-a-service to blockchain projects, including rollups, RPC nodes, and account abstraction. The company has established strong partnerships with major ecosystem players like Polygon and Chainlink and showcases multiple high-profile customers through detailed case studies. Revenue streams likely include subscription or usage fees for infrastructure services and consulting. The presence of a developer suite and marketplace indicates a diversified offering aimed at ecosystem growth. The company targets blockchain developers, enterprises, and decentralized application teams, positioning itself as a critical enabler of scalable blockchain solutions. Growth indicators include high TVL, transaction volume, and active user metrics from customer case studies. The partnership ecosystem is robust, enhancing market credibility and reach.

Security posture

Conduit's website security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. The use of modern web technologies and minimal tracking reflects a privacy-aware approach. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the defense-in-depth level. No public security policy or incident response contacts are provided, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which are best practices for security maturity. Compliance with GDPR is not explicitly demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is good but can be improved by adopting standard security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Add standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Create and publish a security policy page including incident response contacts.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Conduit XYZ
Description
Deploy a chain in minutes, not months. Scale your onchain app or ecosystem with dedicated blockspace and throughput.
Key services
Custom chains (Rollups and L1s), RPC Nodes, Account Abstraction, Indexing, Developer Suite, VRF Oracle, Bridged USDC deployment, Marketplace for 3rd-party apps
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, JavaScript, CSS, JSON-LD structured data, Plausible Analytics
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Typeform, Finsweet CMS Filter
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong focus on blockchain infrastructure and developer tooling.
  3. Multiple customer testimonials and case studies enhance trust.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main site.
  5. Contact information is available via email and forms.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics with minimal tracking.
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript and CSS for a responsive and performant user experience. Structured data in JSON-LD format enhances SEO and content discoverability. Hosting on Webflow ensures reliable uptime and fast content delivery. Analytics are implemented via Plausible, a privacy-focused service, minimizing user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features. No technical debt or deprecated technologies are evident. Opportunities for modernization include adding security headers and improving privacy compliance mechanisms. The technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with scalable and maintainable architecture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with conduit.xyz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review conduit.xyz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.