Skip to main content

Security report for condition.lt

UAB Baltic Condition · Technology · Lithuania

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

31/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB Baltic Condition is a Lithuanian IT company specializing in innovative information technology solutions, including web development, CRM software rental, and cloud computing services. Established in 2005, the company serves over 500 clients primarily in Western Europe and collaborates closely with partners in Germany. Their business model focuses on providing customized software solutions and web services, leveraging a quality management system certified under ISO 9001:2008. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a professional digital presence built on ASP.NET and DNN CMS technologies, incorporating standard web analytics via Google Analytics. However, the absence of HTTPS and security headers, along with missing privacy and cookie policies, indicates a need for improved security and compliance measures. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable or invalid, raising concerns about domain registration transparency, which impacts overall trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching condition.lt

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
0
Average
31

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a reliable IT service provider with a focus on quality and client customization. Its partnership with German firms and a client base exceeding 500 in Western Europe suggest a stable market presence. Revenue streams likely include CRM software rental, web design, and consulting services. The business targets corporate clients seeking tailored IT and web solutions. The lack of visible contact details on the website may hinder direct client engagement. The company’s ISO certification and long operational history are competitive advantages, but domain registration opacity could affect client confidence.

Security posture

The security posture is currently weak due to the lack of HTTPS, absence of security headers, and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. While the company follows ISO 9001:2008 quality standards, this does not directly address IT security. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy compliance. No security best practices such as CSP or HSTS are implemented, and no contact channels for security incidents are provided. These gaps expose the company to risks including data interception, privacy non-compliance, and reputational damage.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish and publicize an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure process.
  5. Improve website accessibility and mobile optimization to enhance user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB Baltic Condition
Description
Inovatyvių informacinių technologijų sprendimų bendrovė, kurianti individualizuotą programinę įrangą, teikianti web sprendimus, svetainių kūrimą, dizainą, nuomą ir CRM nuomą. Veikia nuo 2005 metų, bendradarbiauja su partneriais Vokietijoje, aptarnauja daugiau kaip 500 klientų Vakarų Europoje.
Key services
Condition CRM nuoma, Interneto svetainių nuoma, Web dizainas, Svetainių kūrimas, Socialiniai tinklai, Specializuota programinė įranga
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, ASP.NET WebForms, DNN (DotNetNuke) CMS, Google Analytics
Frameworks
ASP.NET, DNN CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of ISO 9001:2008 quality management system

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
  2. No HTTPS detected in provided content; site uses HTTP
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found on main pages
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided in visible content
  5. Business claims ISO 9001:2008 certification
  6. Uses DNN CMS and ASP.NET technology stack
  7. Google Analytics is used for tracking
  8. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations
  9. WHOIS data unavailable or domain WHOIS query failed indicating potential domain registration issues
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature ASP.NET and DNN CMS platform, using jQuery and standard JavaScript libraries. The site loads moderate content with some legacy script references and lacks modern performance optimizations. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The absence of HTTPS and security headers is a significant technical risk. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, suggesting room for modernization. No hosting provider details are evident from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires updates to meet current security and compliance standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with condition.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review condition.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.