Skip to main content

Security report for concur.se

Concur Holdings (Netherlands) B.V. · Technology · Netherlands

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SAP Concur Sweden provides enterprise-grade software solutions focused on automating and simplifying business travel, expense, and invoice management. The website reflects a mature, well-established brand with a comprehensive suite of products and services tailored for businesses seeking efficient financial process management. The presence of multiple regional sites and language options indicates a global market reach. Technically, the site is built on Drupal CMS with modern JavaScript frameworks and integrates advanced monitoring and consent management tools, demonstrating a high level of digital maturity. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers and a public security policy are absent. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, supporting SAP Concur's market leadership. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response information, and implementing vulnerability disclosure practices to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching concur.se

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
55
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention concur.se, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for concur.se right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SAP Concur operates as a leading B2B SaaS provider in the travel and expense management sector, serving a large enterprise customer base globally. Their business model centers on subscription-based software solutions that streamline financial workflows. The company leverages its parent SAP's brand and infrastructure, enhancing market credibility. The website's detailed product and solution menus, along with demos and case studies, indicate a strong focus on customer education and engagement. The presence of multiple integrations and support offerings suggests a robust ecosystem approach. Social media and structured data reinforce brand consistency and digital presence. Growth indicators include extensive regional localization and advanced analytics capabilities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS and cookie consent compliance. Use of New Relic and TrustArc indicates active monitoring and privacy management. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of a public security or incident response page represent areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The missing WHOIS data for the exact domain queried is likely due to subdomain usage or proxying, not necessarily a risk factor. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with transparency and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response page to improve transparency.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from external libraries.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Concur Holdings (Netherlands) B.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Concur Holdings (Netherlands) B.V.
Description
SAP Concur simplifies travel, expense, and invoice management for total visibility and greater control.
Key services
Expense management, Travel booking and management, Invoice automation, Budget management, Tax and benefits assurance, Payment solutions, Data insights and analytics
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, JavaScript, New Relic monitoring, TrustArc cookie consent, Boomerang performance monitoring, YouTube embedded videos
Frameworks
Drupal, Schema.org structured data
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of security monitoring scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic, Boomerang
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Akamai (via Boomerang)
Tracking pixels
New Relic, TrustArc
Marketing tools
TrustArc cookie consent, WalkMe
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. Strong branding consistent with SAP Concur corporate identity.
  3. Multiple language and regional versions available.
  4. Comprehensive product and solution offerings detailed.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No security policy or incident response page found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. Use of modern monitoring and analytics tools.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. WHOIS data missing for the domain queried, likely due to subdomain usage.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS with extensive use of JavaScript and modern web technologies. It integrates advanced monitoring tools like New Relic and Boomerang for performance and error tracking. The site uses TrustArc for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. Multimedia content includes embedded YouTube videos and responsive design elements, supporting good mobile optimization. SEO is supported by structured data (JSON-LD) and comprehensive meta tags. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. The technical infrastructure reflects a mature enterprise-grade deployment with a focus on user experience and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with concur.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review concur.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.