Skip to main content

Security report for concur.nl

Concur Holdings (Netherlands) B.V. · Technology · Netherlands

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SAP Concur Netherlands, operating under Concur Holdings (Netherlands) B.V., is a leading enterprise software provider specializing in travel, expense, and invoice management solutions. The website presents a comprehensive portfolio of products and services aimed at businesses seeking to automate and streamline financial processes. The company benefits from strong brand recognition as part of SAP SE, with a clear market position as a top provider in its sector. The digital infrastructure is modern and robust, leveraging Drupal CMS, advanced JavaScript monitoring, and third-party integrations for performance and compliance. Privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are well implemented, reflecting GDPR compliance. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and technically sound, supporting SAP Concur's enterprise-grade service offerings.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching concur.nl

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
55
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention concur.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for concur.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SAP Concur targets enterprise clients requiring integrated travel and expense management solutions. Its business model is B2B SaaS, with revenue streams from software subscriptions and support services. The company maintains a broad partnership ecosystem, including SAP and TrustArc, enhancing compliance and integration capabilities. The website's multilingual and regional presence indicates a global market reach. The product suite covers expense reporting, travel booking, invoice automation, analytics, and compliance assurance, positioning SAP Concur as a comprehensive financial process automation provider. Growth indicators include extensive case studies, demos, and a strong social media presence. The company’s operations reflect a mature, enterprise-focused approach with consistent branding and professional content.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and integrates security monitoring tools such as New Relic. Cookie consent is managed via TrustArc, supporting GDPR compliance. While security headers are likely configured at the server level, explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available, which could hinder transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of modern JavaScript libraries and performance monitoring indicates a proactive approach to security and performance. Recommendations include publishing a formal security policy, incident response contacts, and a vulnerability disclosure program to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and publicly disclose a vulnerability disclosure or bug bounty program, including a security.txt file.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards for users with disabilities.
  4. Ensure all recommended security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy) are explicitly set and documented.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Concur Holdings (Netherlands) B.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Concur Holdings (Netherlands) B.V.
Description
SAP Concur simplifies travel, expense, and invoice management for total visibility and greater control.
Key services
Concur Expense, Concur Travel, Concur Invoice, Budget Management, Tax Assurance, Benefits Assurance, Concur Request, Payment Solutions, ExpenseIt, Drive (Mileage Tracker)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, JavaScript, New Relic monitoring, TrustArc cookie consent, YouTube embedded videos, Responsive CSS frameworks
Frameworks
Drupal, New Relic Browser Agent
Platforms
Web, Mobile responsive design
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security monitoring tools (New Relic)

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic Browser, Boomerang Real User Monitoring
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Akamai, Boomerang
Tracking pixels
New Relic, TrustArc
Marketing tools
TrustArc cookie consent, WalkMe
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive product and solution offerings clearly presented.
  3. Strong branding and consistent corporate identity.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and monitoring tools.
  5. Good privacy and cookie consent mechanisms in place.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found publicly.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected.
  8. Multiple social media and external links to trusted domains.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS with a modern front-end leveraging responsive CSS and JavaScript frameworks. Performance monitoring is implemented via New Relic and Boomerang, indicating a focus on user experience and reliability. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices, including meta tags and structured data. Hosting appears to be supported by Akamai CDN, enhancing global delivery and security. The technical stack is mature and enterprise-grade, though opportunities exist to improve accessibility and explicitly document security configurations. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with concur.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review concur.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.