Skip to main content

Security report for concur.fi

Concur Holdings (Netherlands) B.V. · Technology · Netherlands

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SAP Concur Finland, represented by Concur Holdings (Netherlands) B.V., is a leading enterprise provider of business travel, expense, and invoice management software. The company offers a comprehensive suite of solutions designed to automate and simplify financial processes for businesses globally. Their market position is strong, supported by a large customer base and integration with SAP, a major enterprise software provider. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and extensive content covering products, solutions, and support offerings. Technically, the site is built on Drupal CMS with modern JavaScript frameworks and includes advanced monitoring via New Relic and TrustArc for privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, cookie consent, and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and incident response details are not publicly disclosed. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with GDPR, making it a reliable resource for its target business audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching concur.fi

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
55
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention concur.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for concur.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SAP Concur operates in the technology sector, focusing on B2B SaaS solutions for travel and expense management. Their business model revolves around subscription-based software services integrated with enterprise resource planning systems. The company targets finance leaders, travel managers, and HR professionals in medium to large enterprises. Their competitive advantage lies in automation, integration capabilities, and a broad product portfolio addressing expense, travel, and invoice management. The partnership with SAP enhances their market reach and credibility. The website's multilingual and regional versions indicate a global footprint. The presence of demos, case studies, and detailed product information supports customer engagement and lead generation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and includes security monitoring tools such as New Relic. Cookie consent is managed via TrustArc, indicating GDPR compliance. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Security headers are minimal, and no CSP or HSTS headers were detected in the provided data. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security policies and incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and standards.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement additional HTTP security headers like Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Disclose vulnerability disclosure or bug bounty programs to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Concur Holdings (Netherlands) B.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Concur Holdings (Netherlands) B.V.
Description
SAP Concur simplifies travel, expense, and invoice management for total visibility and greater control.
Key services
Concur Expense, Concur Travel, Concur Invoice, Budget Management, Tax Assurance, Benefits Assurance, Payment Solutions, ExpenseIt, Drive, Intelligent Audit
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Drupal CMS, New Relic monitoring, TrustArc cookie consent, YouTube embedded videos, Bootstrap CSS (implied by classes), HTML5 video
Frameworks
Drupal
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security monitoring (New Relic)

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic, Boomerang
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Akamai (implied by akamaihd.net domain)
Tracking pixels
New Relic, TrustArc, Boomerang
Marketing tools
TrustArc cookie consent, WalkMe
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented and business-focused
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. Use of modern web technologies and monitoring tools
  5. Social media presence is consistent with brand
  6. No signs of suspicious or malicious content
  7. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript and CSS frameworks for responsive and accessible design. It integrates third-party services such as New Relic for performance monitoring and TrustArc for privacy compliance. The site uses HTML5 video and embeds YouTube content for demos. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and preloading optimizations. Accessibility features like skip links and ARIA roles are present. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting details are not explicit but likely enterprise-grade. Technical risks are low, with no visible deprecated or vulnerable libraries. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and publish more detailed technical documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with concur.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review concur.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.