Skip to main content

Security report for concur.es

SAP Concur · Technology · Spain

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SAP Concur Spain offers comprehensive SaaS solutions for managing business travel, expenses, and invoices, targeting enterprises seeking to optimize financial control and operational efficiency. The website reflects a mature digital presence with consistent branding, multilingual support, and rich multimedia content showcasing product demos and client logos. The technical infrastructure leverages Drupal CMS, modern JavaScript frameworks, and integrates advanced monitoring and consent management tools such as New Relic and TrustArc, indicating a high level of digital maturity. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though there is room for improvement in explicit security headers and published incident response policies. Overall, the site demonstrates a professional, trustworthy, and business-focused platform aligned with enterprise needs.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching concur.es

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
55
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention concur.es, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for concur.es right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SAP Concur is positioned as a leading provider in the travel and expense management software market, serving a global enterprise audience. The business model centers on SaaS offerings that automate and simplify financial processes. The website's extensive product catalog, regional site links, and client logos indicate a broad market reach and strong partnership ecosystem. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled contact channels via forms, typical for enterprise software vendors. The presence of SAP as the parent company further reinforces market credibility and resource backing.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and integrates cookie consent management compliant with GDPR. Security best practices include the use of monitoring tools and privacy policies; however, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, representing an area for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contacts limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from increased transparency and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SAP Concur
Description
Optimice la gestión de viajes, gastos y facturas con SAP Concur y mejore el control financiero de su empresa.
Key services
Concur Expense, Concur Travel, Expense management, Travel booking, Analytics, Budget management, Tax Assurance, Benefits Assurance, Fraud detection
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, JavaScript, New Relic monitoring, TrustArc consent management, Boomerang performance monitoring, YouTube embedded videos
Frameworks
Drupal
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Privacy policy compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Akamai (via Boomerang)
Tracking pixels
New Relic, TrustArc
Marketing tools
TrustArc consent manager, Boomerang performance monitoring
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. Strong brand presence with consistent global site links.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No exposed sensitive data or security warnings detected.
  5. Use of modern monitoring and consent technologies.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query restrictions.
  7. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. Contact information primarily via contact forms; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  9. Social media presence on major platforms confirmed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS with extensive use of JavaScript and integrates third-party services for performance monitoring (New Relic), consent management (TrustArc), and video embedding (YouTube). The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and alternate hreflang links for internationalization. Performance is moderate, with some heavy multimedia content. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security headers. Hosting details are not explicitly identified but likely leverage enterprise-grade infrastructure given the brand.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with concur.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review concur.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.