Skip to main content

Security report for concur.co.uk

Concur Technologies, Inc. · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SAP Concur UK operates a comprehensive spend management platform integrating travel, expense, and invoice management solutions. The company is positioned as a market leader with a strong enterprise presence, offering a broad suite of products tailored for businesses of all sizes. Their website reflects a mature digital infrastructure with modern technologies, including Drupal CMS, Google reCAPTCHA, and New Relic monitoring, ensuring a robust user experience and operational monitoring. Security measures such as HTTPS, cookie consent, and form protections are implemented, though explicit security headers and a public security policy are absent. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain registration constraints, but the website's branding and content strongly support legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism, good privacy compliance, and a solid security posture with room for improvement in transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching concur.co.uk

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
55
Email security
40
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SAP Concur UK benefits from its parent company SAP's global reputation and resources. The business model is subscription-based SaaS targeting corporate clients seeking integrated spend management solutions. The company leverages a wide partner ecosystem and offers extensive integrations, enhancing its competitive advantage. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on enterprise clients in the UK and Ireland, with detailed product offerings and customer testimonials reinforcing market leadership. The digital presence supports lead generation through demos, pricing requests, and contact forms, indicating a mature sales funnel. The absence of WHOIS data is a minor anomaly but does not detract from the overall business credibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from automated abuse. Cookie consent is managed via TrustArc, indicating GDPR compliance. Monitoring and performance analytics are handled by New Relic and Boomerang. However, the site lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No public security policy or incident response information is available, and no vulnerability disclosure program is evident. These gaps suggest opportunities to enhance transparency and security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response page.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet or exceed standards and improve user inclusivity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Concur Technologies, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Concur Technologies, Inc.
Description
SAP Concur simplifies spend management for travel, expense, and invoice for total visibility and greater control. Contact us today.
Key services
Concur Expense, Concur Travel, Concur Invoice, Expense fraud detection, Budget management, Invoice capture, Travel booking, Data insights and analytics
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google reCAPTCHA, New Relic monitoring, TrustArc cookie consent, YouTube embedded videos
Frameworks
Drupal CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic, Boomerang
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Akamai
Tracking pixels
New Relic, TrustArc, Google reCAPTCHA, Boomerang
Marketing tools
TrustArc Cookie Consent, Google reCAPTCHA, Boomerang performance monitoring
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong branding and consistent corporate identity aligned with SAP Concur.
  3. Comprehensive product and solution offerings detailed.
  4. Multiple contact methods including a detailed contact form and phone number.
  5. Robust privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and monitoring tools.
  7. No security policy or incident response page found publicly.
  8. WHOIS data is missing or inaccessible, which is unusual but not necessarily suspicious given the brand.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; site is business-focused.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS with a modern JavaScript stack including Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection and New Relic for performance monitoring. The site uses responsive design techniques for mobile optimization and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and CDN usage. The technical implementation is robust but could benefit from additional security headers and enhanced accessibility compliance. The WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual but likely due to domain registration specifics rather than technical issues.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with concur.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review concur.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.