Skip to main content

Security report for concur.be

Concur Holdings (Netherlands) B.V. · Technology · Netherlands

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SAP Concur Belgium, represented by the domain www.concur.be, is a regional site of the global SAP Concur brand, specializing in travel, expense, and invoice management software solutions. The website offers comprehensive information about their products, including Concur Expense, Travel, and Invoice, targeting businesses seeking to automate and control spending processes. The site is well-branded, consistent with SAP's global presence, and provides rich multimedia content, demos, and case studies to engage its enterprise audience. Technically, the site is built on Drupal CMS with modern JavaScript and monitoring tools such as New Relic and TrustArc for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and includes SEO best practices, although some security headers could be enhanced. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but the absence of some security headers and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data for the domain is restricted due to DNS Belgium policies, limiting transparency but not indicating illegitimacy. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained. Strategically, SAP Concur Belgium should enhance its security headers, publish security and incident response policies, and consider adding vulnerability disclosure information to further build trust and compliance. Continuous monitoring and privacy compliance maintenance are recommended to sustain its enterprise-grade reputation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching concur.be

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
55
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SAP Concur Belgium operates as an essential entity within the technology sector, focusing on SaaS solutions for business travel, expense, and invoice management. The company benefits from its parent SAP's global brand and resources, positioning it as a market leader with over 46,000 customers worldwide. Its business model revolves around subscription-based software services targeting enterprise clients. The website reflects a mature digital presence with localized content and extensive product offerings. Partnerships and integrations with SAP and other platforms enhance its ecosystem. Growth indicators include interactive demos, case studies, and a broad regional footprint. The company maintains a strong social media presence and transparent privacy practices, supporting its credibility and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and integration of monitoring tools like New Relic. Cookie consent is managed via TrustArc, indicating GDPR compliance. However, the site lacks some recommended HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and protocol downgrade attacks. No security policy or incident response contact information is published, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by adopting additional headers and publishing formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie consent mechanisms to align with evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Concur Holdings (Netherlands) B.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Concur Holdings (Netherlands) B.V.
Description
SAP Concur simplifies travel, expense, and invoice management for total visibility and greater control.
Key services
Concur Expense, Concur Travel, Concur Invoice, Budget Management, Tax Assurance, Benefits Assurance, Concur Request, Payment Solutions, ExpenseIt, Drive
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, JavaScript, New Relic monitoring, TrustArc cookie consent, YouTube embedded videos, Responsive design, HTML5 video
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of security monitoring tools (New Relic)

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic, Boomerang
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Akamai, New Relic
Tracking pixels
New Relic, TrustArc
Marketing tools
TrustArc Consent Manager, Boomerang by Akamai
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong branding consistent with SAP Concur global presence
  3. Comprehensive product and solution offerings clearly presented
  4. Multiple language and regional site links available
  5. Robust privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  7. WHOIS data is restricted, limiting domain transparency
  8. Security headers could be improved for enhanced protection
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS with a modern JavaScript stack and uses third-party services such as New Relic for performance monitoring and TrustArc for cookie consent management. The site includes responsive design and multimedia content such as HTML5 video and embedded YouTube videos. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization. The WHOIS data is restricted due to registry policies, which is common for .be domains but reduces transparency. Security headers are partially implemented; adding missing headers would improve security. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust and suitable for an enterprise SaaS provider.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with concur.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review concur.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.