Skip to main content

Security report for concilium.digital

CONCILIUM · Technology · France

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CONCILIUM is a French consulting firm specializing in digital transformation and digital support services for businesses, public institutions, foundations, and associations. Established since 2015, the company offers tailored consulting in digital projects, e-marketing, e-commerce, social media management, event digitalization, GDPR compliance, and training. The firm positions itself as a trusted advisor in the digital transformation space with a strong presence in Paris and across France. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and client references. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, integrating modern web technologies and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Tag Manager. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled, though additional security headers could enhance protection. Privacy compliance is basic with no explicit privacy or terms of service pages found, but a cookie consent mechanism is present. Overall, the site is well-designed, accessible, and trustworthy, with no signs of malicious activity or content blocking.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching concilium.digital

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CONCILIUM operates in the technology consulting sector, focusing on digital transformation services for a diverse clientele including public institutions and non-profit organizations. Their business model centers on providing expert consulting, technical solutions, and training to support digital projects and e-commerce initiatives. The company leverages a strong social media presence and client testimonials to build credibility. Market positioning is solid for a small-sized firm with over 100 projects annually, indicating steady demand and growth potential. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a preference for managed contact via forms and social channels, aligning with modern digital engagement practices. The firm’s partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms but no direct third-party business partners were identified from the website data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents an area for improvement to mitigate risks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. The WordPress platform and plugins should be regularly updated to prevent vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. The site does not expose any known vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns, and the domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is reasonable for a consulting business. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from additional hardening and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure additional HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Establish and disclose incident response and security policies to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate security risks.
  5. Consider adding direct verified contact information such as company emails or phone numbers to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CONCILIUM
Description
CONCILIUM est un cabinet de conseil en accompagnement digital des entreprises à Paris et en transformation digitale.
Key services
Digital transformation consulting, Social media management, Technical solutions, Event digitalization, Training and coaching, GDPR compliance, E-commerce support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO, Elementor, Axeptio SDK
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-focused plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in French with professional consulting focus.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found, but cookie consent mechanism present.
  4. Social media presence is strong and consistent with business branding.
  5. WHOIS data is privacy protected, limiting registrant transparency.
  6. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and Yoast SEO.
  7. Security headers could be improved for enhanced protection.
  8. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected.
  9. Contact is primarily via contact form and social media; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  10. Content is safe for general audiences with no adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking and performance monitoring. The site loads with moderate speed and is mobile optimized with basic accessibility features. The use of external CDNs for Elementor assets and analytics scripts is observed. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. The site could improve accessibility and security by implementing ARIA roles more extensively and adding security headers. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with concilium.digital. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review concilium.digital.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.