Skip to main content

Security report for conceptboard.com

Conceptboard · Technology · Germany

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Conceptboard is a well-established SaaS provider specializing in visual collaboration tools designed for real-time, remote, and secure teamwork. The company targets government, education, and business sectors with a GDPR-compliant platform hosted in Germany. With over 14 million users globally, Conceptboard positions itself as a trusted collaboration solution emphasizing data security and compliance. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, customer testimonials, and clear calls to action for demos and trials. Technically, the site leverages WordPress CMS, AWS hosting, and modern JavaScript libraries, optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is strong, supported by ISO certifications and GDPR adherence, though DNSSEC is not enabled and CSP could be improved. Overall, the site demonstrates a professional, secure, and user-friendly environment suitable for enterprise clients.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: NetBIOS

      Port 139 (NetBIOS) is publicly accessible - NetBIOS - Windows file sharing

      What to do: Consider restricting access to NetBIOS or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching conceptboard.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
65
Email security
90
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
95
Average
62
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention conceptboard.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
10,070
Employees
12
Customers
10,044
Third parties
14
Weak passwords
8%

Latest record dated 2026-02-20 · 49 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for conceptboard.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –staging.conceptboard.com2026-02-20
  • –app.dev.conceptboard.com2026-02-20
  • –app.conceptboard.com2026-02-20
  • –vaultwarden.noffice.conceptboard.com2026-02-20
  • –metabase.noffice.conceptboard.com2026-02-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Conceptboard operates in the technology sector, focusing on collaboration software with a strong emphasis on security and compliance. Its business model is subscription-based SaaS, serving medium to large enterprises, government agencies, and educational institutions. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with platforms like Microsoft 365, Jira, and Confluence to enhance workflow compatibility. The presence of a bug bounty program and ISO certifications indicates a mature security culture. The company’s market positioning is reinforced by extensive customer success stories and a broad user base. Growth indicators include active content marketing, multilingual support, and a clear focus on GDPR compliance, which is critical for European and global clients.

Security posture

Conceptboard exhibits a high level of security maturity with ISO 27001, 27017, and 27018 certifications and GDPR compliance. The platform is hosted in German data centers, ensuring data sovereignty. Security best practices include HTTPS enforcement, domain status protections, and a bug bounty program. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be a potential risk for DNS spoofing attacks. Content Security Policy issues were detected, suggesting room for improvement in mitigating cross-site scripting risks. No explicit incident response contacts or security.txt files were found, which could enhance transparency and response readiness. Overall, the security posture is robust but could benefit from incremental improvements in DNS security and CSP enforcement.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Enhance Content Security Policy to eliminate CSP violations and improve script security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure contacts.
  4. Add additional security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options for improved protection.
  5. Maintain and promote the bug bounty program to encourage responsible vulnerability reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Conceptboard
Description
Visual collaboration: real-time, remote & secure. Perfect for government, education & businesses – GDPR-compliant & user-friendly.
Key services
Visual collaboration whiteboard, Real-time remote collaboration, Secure data storage, Templates for various use cases
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, WP Rocket, WordPress, Borlabs Cookie, Swiper.js
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
AWS (Amazon Registrar, AWS DNS servers)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited
  • ISO 27001/17/18 certifications
  • GDPR compliance
  • Bug bounty program

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (implied)
Marketing tools
Borlabs Cookie
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong emphasis on GDPR compliance and data security.
  3. Multiple ISO certifications highlighted.
  4. Clear business focus on visual collaboration for enterprises and government.
  5. Multiple customer testimonials and success stories enhance trust.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations.
  7. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented.
  8. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, address, and forms.
  9. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js, with performance optimizations via WP Rocket. Hosting is provided by Amazon AWS, ensuring scalability and reliability. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. SEO is well-implemented with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Cookie consent is managed by Borlabs Cookie, supporting GDPR compliance. The site shows no signs of technical debt or outdated technologies, indicating a well-maintained infrastructure. Minor improvements could be made in security header implementation and DNS configuration to further enhance the technical robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with conceptboard.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review conceptboard.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.